<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assessing Jose Bautista&#8217;s Fit on the Red Sox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/28/how-jose-bautista-could-fit-on-the-red-sox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/28/how-jose-bautista-could-fit-on-the-red-sox/</link>
	<description>Bringing BP-quality analysis to Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 04:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Carsley</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/28/how-jose-bautista-could-fit-on-the-red-sox/#comment-10554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Carsley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2016 20:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=12954#comment-10554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;d be ideal, yes, but it&#039;s worth mentioning that Beltre was 31 when he signed his pillow contract and Bautista is about to be 36. He&#039;s probably not as worried about a long-term payday as he is collecting as much as possible right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;d be ideal, yes, but it&#8217;s worth mentioning that Beltre was 31 when he signed his pillow contract and Bautista is about to be 36. He&#8217;s probably not as worried about a long-term payday as he is collecting as much as possible right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/28/how-jose-bautista-could-fit-on-the-red-sox/#comment-10530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Goldberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=12954#comment-10530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s already a great model for how to do this, and it&#039;s the Adrian Beltre &quot;pillow&quot; contract with an extra to make it worth giving up the draft pick. If Bautista gets down to the 10(ish) million range, offer him 1 year at 8M plus a player option at 2M and team option at 15M. That would only count as 5M against the luxury tax because player options are considered guaranteed money/years under the CBA (assuming that didn&#039;t change with the new CBA).   The Sox get 2 things as an upside that can make it worth the draft pick - staying comfortably under the tax threshold and if Bautista stays healthy and returns to being anything like an elite bat, they get an extra year at a good price that isn&#039;t too bad for Bautista at the age he would otherwise be going out on the market next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s already a great model for how to do this, and it&#8217;s the Adrian Beltre &#8220;pillow&#8221; contract with an extra to make it worth giving up the draft pick. If Bautista gets down to the 10(ish) million range, offer him 1 year at 8M plus a player option at 2M and team option at 15M. That would only count as 5M against the luxury tax because player options are considered guaranteed money/years under the CBA (assuming that didn&#8217;t change with the new CBA).   The Sox get 2 things as an upside that can make it worth the draft pick &#8211; staying comfortably under the tax threshold and if Bautista stays healthy and returns to being anything like an elite bat, they get an extra year at a good price that isn&#8217;t too bad for Bautista at the age he would otherwise be going out on the market next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
