<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case for Alex Cobb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/14/the-case-for-alex-cobb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/14/the-case-for-alex-cobb/</link>
	<description>Bringing BP-quality analysis to Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 04:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binyamin</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/14/the-case-for-alex-cobb/#comment-15949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Binyamin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=36243#comment-15949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teachdad046
I agree that they&#039;re not signing Cobb with a $232M payroll. Unfortunately. And next year is just as bad. BTW the Porcello 2.0 WAR for &#039;17 is from fangraphs where he was, in fact, the fourth-best starter by WAR for the Sox. Which is odd because I thought fWAR was FIP-based and Porcello gives up a lot of homers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teachdad046<br />
I agree that they&#8217;re not signing Cobb with a $232M payroll. Unfortunately. And next year is just as bad. BTW the Porcello 2.0 WAR for &#8217;17 is from fangraphs where he was, in fact, the fourth-best starter by WAR for the Sox. Which is odd because I thought fWAR was FIP-based and Porcello gives up a lot of homers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teachdad46</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/14/the-case-for-alex-cobb/#comment-15948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teachdad46]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=36243#comment-15948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with everything you wrote, Cam. But there&#039;s a fly in the ointment, isn&#039;t there? Signing Cobb would most likely result in the Sox exceeding the $237 million salary cap and cost them the highest tax, no? I&#039;m also curious that you chose Porky as the Sox Number Four Starter. Based on what? By WAR he was seventh (!); by rotation he started the opener and then, as we all sadly remember, the &#039;rotation&#039; was a mess with ERod, Price, and Wright all missing significant time. But other than the cap, I totally agree...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with everything you wrote, Cam. But there&#8217;s a fly in the ointment, isn&#8217;t there? Signing Cobb would most likely result in the Sox exceeding the $237 million salary cap and cost them the highest tax, no? I&#8217;m also curious that you chose Porky as the Sox Number Four Starter. Based on what? By WAR he was seventh (!); by rotation he started the opener and then, as we all sadly remember, the &#8216;rotation&#8217; was a mess with ERod, Price, and Wright all missing significant time. But other than the cap, I totally agree&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
