<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boston &#187; Dave Dombrowski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/tag/dave-dombrowski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com</link>
	<description>Bringing BP-quality analysis to Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Mookie Betts&#8217; Waning Aggression</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/07/mookie-betts-waning-aggression/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/07/mookie-betts-waning-aggression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cam Ellis]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=34121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happened to Mookie jumping on early pitches?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be quite honest, I&#8217;m getting tired of trying to come up with new witty quips about how boring this offseason has been. Since late December I&#8217;ve been starting Roster Recaps with a variety of overplayed jokes, the majority of which probably missed the mark, and it&#8217;s taken it&#8217;s toll.  Mookie Betts winning his arbitration case, while not insignificant, can&#8217;t be the most exciting news of the offseason. I don&#8217;t know how I&#8217;m going to spend the next month waiting to make presumptive claims that, hey, Rusney Castillo actually looks <em>really good </em>in early March. SOMETHING HAPPEN. PLEASE.</p>
<p>The assumption this offseason has been that the Red Sox are going to add a big bat. The offense was D.O.A. just a bit too often last summer for Dave Dombrowski, and the J.D. Martinez match just fits too well.</p>
<p><em>*knocks on wood until his knuckles bleed*</em></p>
<blockquote><p>All the &#8220;_____ needs to be better&#8221; noise seems to start and end with Mookie.</p></blockquote>
<p>The team seems to be out of the Eric Hosmer Sweepstakes™, so at this point it seems like it&#8217;s JD Martinez or bust. The notion that the Red Sox could benefit purely from internal improvement isn&#8217;t one that the team disagrees with, as Dombrowski <del>threw some players under the bus </del> mentioned earlier in the offseason that they were counting on offensive improvements across the board.</p>
<p>All the &#8220;_____ needs to be better&#8221; noise seems to start and end with Mookie. While it&#8217;s not entirely fair &#8212; Betts was still an above-average offensive player last season &#8212; it&#8217;s easy to understand why some might have been underwhelmed by his production. He was a 7-8 win player (depending on where you look) in 2016, but came up short of repeating that in 2017. After slashing .318/.363/.534 in 2016, Betts hit .264/.344/.459 last year, prompting many to fire up their hottest takes and yell endlessly into the void.</p>
<p>Let me stress again that Betts was good &#8212; very good, even &#8212; last year. He&#8217;s still one of the premier young players in baseball, and the 10.5 million dollars that an independent arbiter awarded him proves that. The first thing that sticks out when you look and see what went &#8220;wrong&#8221; last year is Betts&#8217; aggression at the plate. Here, courtesy of Brooks Baseball, are Betts&#8217; swinging percentages from 2016 and 2017:</p>
<p><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/02/Screen-Shot-2018-02-01-at-7.52.35-PM.png"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-34124" src="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/02/Screen-Shot-2018-02-01-at-7.52.35-PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2018-02-01 at 7.52.35 PM" width="600" height="109" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/02/Screen-Shot-2018-02-01-at-7.58.51-PM.png"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-34125" src="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/02/Screen-Shot-2018-02-01-at-7.58.51-PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2018-02-01 at 7.58.51 PM" width="600" height="97" /></a></p>
<p>Also worth noting: Betts&#8217; walk rate rose over four percentage points between 2016 and 2017, the largest jump of his young career. Betts was clearly more selective at the dish, and I can&#8217;t help but wonder how much being more selective hurt his overall offensive profile. Drawing more walks is by no means a bad thing, but Betts wasn&#8217;t just laying off bad pitches &#8212; he also took strikes at a higher rate than either of his previous two years, and the most since his first season in the bigs. This team isn&#8217;t going to live or die by Betts taking marginally more walks, but there were more than a few at-bats last season where it seemed like he was taking pitches that he could have done a lot of damage with.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s entirely coincidental that Mookie&#8217;s best offensive year also came when he was most aggressive at the plate. We already know he has a great eye, as made evident by the consistently-low strikeout rate he&#8217;s kept over his three full seasons. I&#8217;m of the opinion that the best version of Mookie Betts is a bit more of a free-swinger than he was last season, and Alex Cora&#8217;s look-for-early-strikes methodology seems to say the team agrees.</p>
<p>In the end, learning how to better draw walks was probably a good thing for Betts&#8217; career. Especially considering that Betts will be the leadoff hitter heading into spring, it&#8217;s nice to know that he&#8217;s learning how to work a count. With that said, I selfishly want to see him swing the bat more, because days like this make him so damn fun to watch:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/m/1050681683" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><em>Photo by Wendell Cruz &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/07/mookie-betts-waning-aggression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Red Sox, The Celtics, and the Future</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/25/the-red-sox-the-celtics-and-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/25/the-red-sox-the-celtics-and-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Poarch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Boston Unfiltered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Cherington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Kimbrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Pedroia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanley Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Groome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Millar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Youkilis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koji Uehara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chavis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Moreland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=33694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's an innate need for stability that the Red Sox don't seem to have.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: Boston’s sports franchises are doing interesting things. The Patriots are back in the Super Bowl, the Celtics are in first place in the Eastern Conference, and the Bruins are second in the NHL in points. For Boston fans that have come to expect consistent success, this year has been no disappointment.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">For all those teams’ success, there’s a notable local organization lagging behind in terms of hype: the Red Sox. Few people seem to be talking about them right now. It’s been an unusually quiet offseason across the MLB, but perhaps the only Red Sox talking point of note right now is the extended stare-down with free agent J.D. Martinez. After that, it’s… Mitch Moreland’s two-year deal? Yikes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I’m not used to feeling so unenthused about the Red Sox. They were the team that brought me into Boston sports, after all. In a manner of speaking, I suppose I&#8217;m sort of a bandwagon fan, but it wasn&#8217;t one of the championship teams that brought me here. No, it was the 2009 team that did that &#8212; if you remember, that&#8217;s the one that got swept by the Angels in the ALDS.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/e45Pob6WbR8?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">It was a simple decision: “Maybe I&#8217;ll give baseball a shot.” I was in high school, and football wasn&#8217;t quite cutting it for me, so I felt it was time to branch out. The Red Sox and Angels were on, and it didn&#8217;t take long for me to get hooked. I loved Dustin Pedroia’s fiery demeanor, David Ortiz’s easy confidence, and most of all, Kevin Youkilis’ completely absurd batting stance. Jon Lester’s triumph over lymphoma was incredibly cool, and Josh Beckett looked liable to beat up an opposing hitter at a moment’s notice, which was also pretty cool in its own way.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The season ended too soon after, but it was a busy offseason for me; I needed to learn more about these players, this franchise, this city. I knew about The Curse and the legendary 2004 team that finally ended it. I didn&#8217;t know about the comeback against the Yankees, or Kevin Millar’s endless quotability, or Manny’s tendency to always be Manny. I didn&#8217;t know they went back and did it again in 2007 with plenty of new faces, including the undefinable Pedroia, the Laser Show and the Muddy Chicken, who I did know was a man after my own heart as soon as I read about his “Ask Jeff Francis who the fuck I am,” quote.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I’m on my ninth year with the Boston Red Sox now, and I&#8217;ve seen my fair share of highs and lows, from fried chicken and beer to getting a chance to watch a Boston championship myself. I got to see David Ortiz’s famed postseason heroics live before my eyes, as he was engulfed in flames against the Cardinals and drove the team of beards and Koji Uehara high fives to their third title in ten years. Those 2013 Red Sox rebounded from the worst record in the AL East the year before, which in some ways encapsulates what its been like to follow this team over that time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">If the Red Sox built my Boston fandom, then the Celtics cemented it. My timing wasn’t any better with them &#8212; I started following just late enough to miss the dominant 2007-08 championship team. Still, over the next several seasons, I was hooked. The “Big Three” Celtics were a team of dominant personalities &#8212; Paul Pierce’s unshakable confidence, Kevin Garnett’s frenzied barking, Ray Allen’s unflappable consistency &#8212; and even as they all began to grow old, there was a pridefulness to them. The decrepit Celtics were an annoyance, the team that would give too much effort every night and use their veteran saavy to frustrate younger, more athletic teams. They took LeBron James and the eventual champion Miami Heat to seven games in the 2011-12 Eastern Conference Finals, and it was sort of a last hurrah for the group. LeBron might have buried them, but they went out swinging.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/N7Gvg4M2wVs?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Since the Celtics’ loss to Miami and the Red Sox win over St. Louis the next year, the two franchises have seemed to trend in different directions. The Celtics hit rock bottom in 2013-14, going 25-57 and finishing 12th in the Eastern Conference. They’ve made the playoffs and improved their record in every season since. Meanwhile, the Red Sox have been, to some extent, treading water. They’ve posted two losing seasons since the championship, followed by consecutive 93-win campaigns where they never really felt like a legitimate contender.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">It feels as though there’s just more of a </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">plan</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400"> behind the Celtics than the Red Sox. Danny Ainge has spent years meticulously compiling and flipping draft picks, capitalizing on undervalued players, and finding the right opportunities to spend. The two most significant free agent signings in franchise history &#8212; Al Horford and Gordon Hayward &#8212; came in the past two offseasons. Ainge avoids panic moves and trades from a position of strength as well as any GM in professional sports, to the point where he’s often teased for his reluctance to part with his assets. This past summer, the Celtics passed on a number of potential deals for superstars who changed teams. Paul George was available, but is also on the final year of his contract, likely to bolt for Los Angeles this coming summer. It was a bad bet for Ainge to pay up for a player he couldn’t guarantee he could keep, so he didn’t.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">On the flip side, the Red Sox have seen three executives in charge of baseball operations since 2011, and few baseball executives are more different than one another in terms of philosophy than the latter two &#8212; Ben Cherington and Dave Dombrowski. Cherington, though he had his own faults, was more similar to Ainge &#8212; building up the farm system and avoiding bad contracts that would kill flexibility… right up until he signed two </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">awful </span></i><span style="font-weight: 400">contracts that </span><span style="font-weight: 400">destroyed</span><span style="font-weight: 400"> his flexibility in Pablo Sandoval and Hanley Ramirez.</span></p>
<blockquote><p>The Red Sox have seen three executives in charge of baseball operations since 2011, and few baseball executives are more different than one another in terms of philosophy than the latter two.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Enter Dombrowski, who, to a fault, loves the big splash. Dombrowski was hired in August of 2015, and by November, he’d already shelled out $217 million to David Price and shipped four prospects away in exchange for Craig Kimbrel. That’s not to say these deals were the wrong things to do at the time, but considering Dombrowski’s body of work, it’s a fair critique to say that he often opts to throw money and assets at problems until they go away.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Subsequently, this current offseason isn’t terribly surprising. Dombrowski is locked in a staring contest with J.D. Martinez, who is a player this lineup desperately needs. The Red Sox are starved for power, and previous deals have left the farm system depleted enough to make trades for top-end talent difficult. If Martinez ends up elsewhere, there may not be another move to be made right now.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">And in some ways, that’s the point. Danny Ainge didn’t </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">need</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400"> Paul George. He was building on a team that made the conference finals the year before and months later is sitting in first place in the conference right now, all while sitting on a treasure hoard of draft picks and young talent. He’s a strong, independent GM who don’t need no blockbuster trade. There were dozens of pathways open to the Celtics this past summer, and all Ainge had to do was find the one he liked the best. The one he chose has the Celtics competitive right now without sacrificing virtually any long-term upside.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">This kind of result is difficult to achieve without consistency, and, in essence, the Red Sox have been an organizational roller coaster. Cherington took charge and immediately had to address missteps by Theo Epstein, most notably the infamous Carl Crawford contract. Since his departure, Cherington’s carefully cultivated farm system has largely either graduated or been shipped off by Dombrowski. Conversely, Dombrowski has had to struggle with those albatross contracts for Sandoval and Ramirez, the latter of which is still owed $44 million over the next two years, assuming his option vests. They’ve been tying knots and challenging the next guy to unravel them. Is Dave Dombrowski the guy to lead a franchise to sustained, long-term success? Tigers fans of the past three seasons might have some thoughts on the matter.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">This is all a long way of saying that, as a fan, the Red Sox don’t give me that feeling of utter confidence the way the Celtics do. Remember the feeling we all had when that large contract for Pablo Sandoval looked likely, even though the case against that signing was obvious? It’s certainly unrealistic to expect any team to operate as efficiently and with as high of a success rate as the Celtics have over the past 10+ years, but there’s an unavoidable aura of “I hope this doesn’t blow up in our faces” in place.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">My point is not to predict doom and gloom with the current state of the Red Sox. Far from it. They’re more likely than not to win 90+ games again this season, and they have a collection of young stars like Mookie Betts, Andrew Benintendi, and Rafael Devers that will be anchoring the lineup for years to come. They have two Cy Young winners in their starting rotation, and those guys aren’t even as good as their ace. If you’re going to have problems with your baseball franchise, these are probably the ones to have &#8212; it certainly beats being the Derek Jeter-led Marlins.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/brLINZMIeic?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">But following the Red Sox transformed my sports fandom, and not long after that, the Celtics did it again. It’s impossible not to compare the two. I love watching Mookie Betts and Chris Sale, but on the macro level, something’s just fundamentally </span><span style="font-weight: 400">off </span><span style="font-weight: 400">with the Red Sox right now, and it’s never more apparent than when the Celtics are on TV. With as much as the team has going for it right now, it’s telling that they’re receiving so little buzz &#8212; and that’s without mentioning how the Yankees appear to be rising fast.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I can’t say for sure how good the Red Sox will be this season &#8212; too much depends on Martinez’s status, first and foremost. Players like Price, Ramirez, and Pedroia are aging, Chris Sale has two years remaining on his contract, and younger contributors like Betts and Bogaerts are into their arbitration seasons. Jason Groome and Michael Chavis are nice prospects, but even Groome is still a-ways off, and the system around them is thin. Major roster decisions are coming in the next few years, and it’s hard to divine the greater plan in place here &#8212; if in fact there is one.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I know the Celtics will be very good, though. They already are, and there isn’t much reason to think they won’t continue to be for years to come. Danny Ainge has put together a well-oiled machine that has missed the playoffs only three times since the 2003-04 season. For a Red Sox franchise in need of some year-to-year consistency and sustained success, looking to their sibling franchise for some ideas might not be the worst idea.</span></p>
<p><em>Photo by Greg M. Cooper &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/25/the-red-sox-the-celtics-and-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roster Recap: A Guy Named Chase d&#8217;Arnaud</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/05/roster-recap-a-guy-named-chase-darnaud/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/05/roster-recap-a-guy-named-chase-darnaud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Kory]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Holt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase d'Arnaud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Pedroia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernando Abad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Mauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=32656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was on the team, I swear.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it say about a player when pinch-hitter is listed second on a three item list of his defensive positions? What does it say about the same player who appeared in two games, and despite said list of defensive positions, never played the field? What does it say about a player when he was a member of three different organizations within the same calendar year, the least time of which came with the Boston Red Sox? What kind of impact can a player like that &#8212; we’ll call him “Chase d’Arnaud” &#8212; have? In this case, more impact than anyone could ever imagine, assuming nobody anywhere in New England possesses a functioning imagination.</p>
<p>“Imagine a…”</p>
<p>“Let me stop you right there.”</p>
<p>The Red Sox snagged d’Arnaud off waivers from the Atlanta Braves in the dead of night during a late April injury blizzard. Dustin Pedroia was having trouble with his knees, as was Pablo Sandoval who, it turned out, was also terrible. Brock Holt’s vertigo prevented him from helping out and Josh Rutledge was still in Triple-A recovering from a hamstring strain sustained while participating in ham-on-a-string exercises (unrelated) during Spring Training. All of a sudden, the Red Sox had no middle infielders they could play after Xander Bogaerts but, more importantly, they had no middle infielders they could not play. The Red Sox were all of a sudden a baseball team without this most important of commodities. Who was going to sit in the dugout, chat to nobody about things, and chew sunflower seeds?</p>
<p>Of course, the answer to their injury epidemic is obvious in retrospect: surgically remove the legs of every infielder on the roster and auction off the severed limbs for charity. Just think how one of Brock Holt’s legs would look in a plastic case adorned with a Red Sox logo up on your mantle? It’d be magnificent, and the Jimmy Fund would make a fortune. Strangely, that most clear of answers seemed to elude everyone, so, in lieu of that, the Red Sox went waiver wire dumpster diving to solve their problems. They came across some pretty sweet cardboard boxes, a few dead fish, Chase d’Arnaud, and bag of half-eaten cat crunchies.</p>
<p>You might not expect much of anyone acquired in such a manner, and certainly d’Arnaud was no different from those low expectations, but boy howdy he delivered on each and every low expectation. The Red Sox called on d’Arnaud during an early May game against the Twins. The Red Sox entered the ninth inning leading Minnesota 7-6, but the Red Sox quickly gained a small and precarious lead by scoring eight runs. After an infield single by Dustin Pedroia, manager John Farrell, looking down the barrel of a gun, turned to his best player.</p>
<p>“Get in there, d’Arnaud!” he probably didn’t ever shout.</p>
<p>“You got it, skip!” replied the ever-ready part-time pinch-hitter.</p>
<p>d’Arnaud took his place at first base and immediately began dancing dangerously off the bag. Twins pitcher Justin Haley threw over to first once, twice, three times, desperate to preserve the eight-run deficit for what he felt would be the Twins inevitable comeback during the bottom of the inning. But d’Arnaud’s wild dancing frustrated him. He threw over again and again and again and again, but each time d’Arnaud dove back just ahead of the tag. After Haley’s last throw, Twins first baseman Joe Mauer trotted over to Haley. “The kid’s just too good,” said Mauer. “Focus on the batter.”</p>
<p>“I can’t,” replied Haley. “I’m just too flummoxed. I’m going to have to throw a really bad pitch.”</p>
<p>“Well, uh, okay,” said Mauer, and handed Haley the ball. Haley’s next pitch was a meatball. Xander Bogaerts hit it for a triple, scoring Mookie Betts and d’Arnaud all the way from first, and extending the Red Sox lead to a comfortable 10 runs. The Red Sox were just able to hold on in the bottom of the inning. They won 17-6, all thanks to Chase d’Arnaud.</p>
<p>You might think that after such a performance the Red Sox might have started d’Arnaud, but they did not. Asked about it by reporters, manager John Farrell winked and grinned. “I like to keep my secret weapons where I can use them when I need them,” he said. Later that day against the Brewers, Farrell needed his secret once more. Trailing 6-1 in the top of the fifth inning, Farrell tried something radical. “This isn’t working,” he reportedly whispered to himself. “Think, John. Dammit, you’ve got to think!” With one out and the pitcher due up, it suddenly hit Farrell like a ton of bricks: d’Arnaud!</p>
<p>“Get in there, d’Arnaud!” he definitely didn’t ever say.</p>
<p>“You got it, skip!” replied the ever-ready part-time pinch-runner.</p>
<p>With d’Arnaud running up the steps, Farrell stopped him. “You’re going to need this,” he said, handing him a broom. “Was that supposed to be a bat?” d’Arnaud asked? “You guessed it,” chuckled Farrell. “I’m really not very good at this managing thing.” Thus inspired d’Arnaud stepped to the plate against possibly the best pitcher in the history of baseball, Wily Peralta.</p>
<p>Peralta’s first pitch was a 110 mph fastball on the corner. “Strike one!” shouted the umpire. His second pitch was a 120 mph fastball on the inside corner. “Strike two!” shouted the umpire. d’Arnaud stepped out of the box. He realized what he was up against. He knew how nobody had ever faced a more perilous situation in baseball, but he was determined. He cocked his bat and stood there watching as a 99 mph curveball draped itself around the plate. “Ball one,” said the umpire. Now d’Arnaud was ready. He stared out at Peralta who stared back, both knowing what was at stake, perhaps the most important fifth inning at-bat by non-rivals from different leagues in early May in baseball history.</p>
<p>Peralta reared back and fired. d’Arnaud took a mighty swing and hit a weak grounder up the middle. The second baseman fielded the ball, but his heart was heavy when he did, because he knew he could never catch d’Arnaud. Crossing the first base bag, d’Arnaud slowed and stopped before the enormity, the sheer gravity of what he’d done struck him. As his team mates raced from the dugout to mob him and the loudspeakers blared the theme to The Natural, d’Arnaud knelt gently in the grass, a single tear falling from his face. Somewhere, Robert Redford muttered, “No, that’s perfect,” as d’Arnaud was lifted and carried around the field by his teammates.</p>
<p>The next inning they took him out for Fernando Abad. That would be the last time d’Arnaud stepped on a playing field for the Boston Red Sox. Asked about his decision to release d’Arnaud, Team President Dave Dombrowski said, “When you love something, set it free.”</p>
<p>But I digress. On to his season recap!</p>
<h4>What Went Right</h4>
<p>He got an infield single in his only Red Sox at-bat.</p>
<h4>What Went Wrong</h4>
<p>Whatever.</p>
<h4>What To Expect</h4>
<p>Nothing.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Jeff Hanisch &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/05/roster-recap-a-guy-named-chase-darnaud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Way But Forward</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/23/no-way-but-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/23/no-way-but-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake Devereaux]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Cora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carson Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Vazquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Kimbrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Pomeranz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Pedroia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eduardo Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giancarlo Stanton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackie Bradley Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Porcello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=28725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the Red Sox, they have no choice but to bet the house.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the ignominious end to the 2017 Red Sox season, there has been much discussion about the road forward. For a team that has won just one playoff game over the last two postseasons, the needs were clear: a new manager and a bunch of offense. Alex Cora has finally been officially hired as manager, so the question is now how the Sox improve the offense.</p>
<p>That answer is simple &#8211; identify the best players available via free agency and trade and go get them. This is the Dave Dombrowski approach to the offseason, and it’s one that has generally worked well, netting him key members of the team like Chris Sale and David Price over the past two years.</p>
<p>The Red Sox made a big deal this year about staying under the luxury tax threshold of $195 million in order to reset the penalties that result when the team exceeds those limits. This has been done. Staying under the cap next year will derive the team no more added benefit other than the money that they would save in doing so. As it stands right now, <a href="http://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/" target="_blank">Cot’s Contracts</a> has the team’s estimated salary for 2018 at slightly over $202 million. The team would actively have to shed players in order to stay under the $197 million threshold for 2018.</p>
<p>This should not be a direction the team looks to go, since time is running out for this core. The 2018 season will be the last year for two of the team’s best pitchers in Drew Pomeranz and Craig Kimbrel, players he acquired via trade. There is also no guarantee that Price won’t opt out of his deal at the end of 2018 if he is healthy and pitching well, though admittedly this is the best scenario for both the team and the player. After the 2019 season, things start to get really bleak, Sale, Xander Bogaerts, Rick Porcello, and Tyler Thornburg will all become free agents. Say what you want about Porcello, but he eats innings, comes with modest upside, and is signed to a fair deal. Thornburg may yet even play baseball. Finally, after 2020 Mookie Betts, Dustin Pedroia, Jackie Bradley Jr., Christian Vazquez, and Carson Smith will all hit free agency, leaving the team with a core of Eduardo Rodriguez, Rafael Devers, and Andrew Benintendi.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qwsO59k5Ucc?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>It’s entirely possible &#8211; perhaps even probable &#8211; that the team gets extensions done with key members of the team like Betts, Sale, and Bogaerts but it’s far from a sure thing. Dombrowski sure isn’t going to bank on those things happening, nor should he. Everything he has done as president of baseball operations has been to optimize this current window, when he knows he has these players under contract during the prime of their careers. The most important seasons for this team are the next two years, while Sale remains under contract. Next year is especially significant because the team has relatively few holes in the rotation and bullpen, but could use an offensive boost at first base and designated hitter positions, both specifically mentioned by Dombrowski in his press conference following John Farrell’s firing.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the American League has gotten a whole lot better. The Yankees were one win away from the World Series with an enviable core of young controllable players. They are also primed to exit next year’s off-season with Bryce Harper, Manny Machado, and Dallas Keuchel as new members of their team. You might laugh, but this has been Brian Cashman’s plan all along. The team even has the space this offseason to sign an ace like Yu Darvish while still staying under the luxury tax threshold, resetting themselves for their upcoming spending spree.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just the in-division threat. The Houston Astros and Cleveland Indians aren’t going anywhere, with large parts of their 100-win teams locked up for the next few seasons. Maybe Dombrowski picked a terrible time to push his chips in, but he had no choice but to maximize the current roster. It won’t be easy getting past the Yankees, Astros, and Indians, but there’s no way around them. They need to go right through.</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe Dombrowski picked a terrible time to push his chips in, but he had no choice but to maximize the current roster.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dombrowski needs to go out and do what he does best and sign J.D. Martinez. He can’t stop there though, he needs at least one more bat, so maybe Eric Hosmer, or perhaps Giancarlo Stanton. If it was up to me, I’d cut Hanley Ramirez, play Martinez at DH and sign Hosmer to play first. But why stop there? Dombo should sign a quality lefty reliever like Mike Minor or Jake McGee and then call it a day. Will he obliterate the luxury tax threshold by doing this? Yes, but so what? The Dodgers have had payrolls upward of $271 million over the last few years, and they’re in the World Series.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that when Dombrowski recognizes a need, he goes out and addresses that need. He doesn’t take any half measures; he addresses needs with full force. For a team that had a likability problem in 2017, changing managers was a great idea. Let’s give the new manager the tools he needs to succeed in 2018 and beyond. I think John Henry and the rest of the ownership group will find out that long playoff runs and lineups that can hit will make back any additional money spent on payroll. When the duck boats cruise past Government Center, the last thing we will all be thinking about is the luxury tax threshold.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Bob DeChiara &#8211; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/23/no-way-but-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Costs of Going All In</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/20/the-costs-of-going-all-in/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/20/the-costs-of-going-all-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Kory]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giancarlo Stanton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Porcello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusney Castillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=28568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The team has reached a financial crossroads.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This off-season represents a fork in the road for the Red Sox franchise. Coming off a(nother) 93-win season, one with significant injuries and underperformance from key young players, the Red Sox could be forgiven for returning the same roster in 2018, perhaps with a few minor tweaks, in the hopes that better things lie ahead. However, it could be argued that the baseball landscape has changed in such a way as to make reassembling the 2017 Red Sox next spring an exercise in futility. In order to not just be competitive but to have a legitimate chance at the World Series, can the Red Sox afford to rerun the 2017 season, or are significant reinforcements required? This is the macro decision that Team President Dave Dombrowski will be faced with this offseason.</p>
<p>We’ve entered into a time when the talent base in Major League Baseball is as stratified as it’s been in a long time, possibly since free agency took hold. This 2017 season featured three 100-win teams, the Dodgers, Astros, and Cleveland. If you believe pythagorean record though, the Yankees should also be added to that list, as their runs scored and allowed numbers were those of a 100-62 team. That only intensifies the situation the Red Sox find themselves in. Over the past 14 seasons (as far back as I looked) there are two seasons with multiple 100-win teams: 2004 and this past season. Obviously there is only one season over that time period that featured more than two 100-win teams: the 2017 season. For Boston, this means three incredibly talented franchises are standing in the way of a World Series win, four if you include the Yankees, and really, why wouldn’t you? That&#8217;s a daunting landscape.</p>
<p>The fact that three of those four are in the American League should be downright terrifying if you work on Yawkey Way. This sets the bar extremely high to win a World Series. Just look at what the Yankees will have to do to win this year’s World Series. They beat the 102-win Indians, and they’re likely to beat the 101-win Astros. Their reward should they accomplish that? They get to play the 104-win Dodgers! That has to be about the most brutal stretch of postseason play imaginable! The only other team I can recall who bested multiple 100-win teams in a single postseason was the 2004 Red Sox, who beat the 101-win Yankees and the 105-win Cardinals, but also beat the 92-win Angels in the first round. Otherwise, this level of competition is unprecedented, yet this is exactly what the 2018 Red Sox are likely to face.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6tz1az1W_ME?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>So how does a team deal with this kind of competition &#8211; a kind of competition that hasn’t been seen in baseball at least for the past few decades, if ever? There are multiple ways of looking at things. The Red Sox could subscribe to what we’ll call the Billy Beane Theory, which says, roughly, just make the playoffs and whatever happens after that is out of your control. The problem with that is it’s only sort of true. Luck plays a huge role in any small sample of baseball games, but even so, it’s incredibly infrequent that a bad team, or even a team you couldn’t make an argument for as one of the best teams in baseball, wins the World Series. It does happen (2011 Cardinals, 2006 Cardinals), but it’s infrequent at best. And just considering the competition, it seems like a poor bet to make. The other part is one of those 100-win teams is in Boston’s division, and the other two are in the other two divisions, so right off you’re competing with the rest of the American League for the Wild Card.</p>
<p>So perhaps the Red Sox should go out and sign J.D. Martinez and trade for Giancarlo Stanton and do more and more and become another 100-win franchise. The problem with that is where the Red Sox are financially. They managed to stay under the luxury cap in 2017 so the tax rate for going over has now dropped substantially, but there is still a penalty. The luxury tax threshold will be $197 million for 2018 and the Red Sox are at $146 million in guarantees before signing anyone eligible for arbitration. Cutting to the end of the page, Cot&#8217;s Contracts estimates the Red Sox to be at $202 million, or $5 million over the cap, before making any additions. For context, the Dodgers spent in the neighborhood of $245 million this season. If the Red Sox are going to go out and give Martinez $20 million and take on Stanton’s contract which will pay him $30 a season going forward, you’re talking about blowing past the Dodgers payroll. Maybe that’s doable for an ownership group that really wants to win another World Series. Maybe the finances are set now that the penalties have been lowered and the team is ready to go all in. Dave Dombrowski is an all-in kind of guy, as we’ve seen. But Pablo Sandoval is making $18.5 million next season and again the season after that. Then, in 2020, there’s a $5 million buyout, but you can take most of those savings and flush them down the nearest toilet because that is also the season that Rusney Castillo’s contract goes from $11 million a season to $14 million. The next is Rick Porcello’s last at $21.125 million per season. That&#8217;s a lot of money over a lot of years, and most of it isn&#8217;t likely to do much to help the Red Sox on the field.</p>
<blockquote><p>Bringing on a player of [Stanton&#8217;s] caliber means the Red Sox are committing to spending over the luxury tax threshold for the foreseeable future.</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, here’s that word “maybe.” Maybe the way the Red Sox dealt with Sandoval and, to a lesser but still significant extent, Castillo, is the new way forward. Damn the torpedoes and all of that, but that seems unlikely. It’s not as sexy, granted, but maybe there’s another win in Jackie Bradley’s bat, and two more in Andrew Benintendi if he can avoid an extended midseason slump, and two more in Mookie Betts’ bat while we&#8217;re at it, and I couldn’t tell you how many more but a lot more in every part of Xander Bogaerts. Take all that and add a healthy David Price &#8211; the guy the organization made a $217 million bet on, remember &#8211; and someone tell Rick Porcello to stop throwing belt high 90 mph heaters and before you know it there’s 98, 99, or 100 wins. Maybe.</p>
<p>Would J.D. Martinez help that cause? You better believe it. Would Stanton? A million times over, yes. But what would be the long term impact of bringing one or both or a similar player to Boston? The Red Sox are a New England institution to be sure, but Fenway isn’t growing more seats and NESN can only broadcast 162 games a year. Revenues might go up a bit, but bringing on a player of that caliber means the Red Sox are committing to spending over the luxury tax threshold for the foreseeable future. This of course only gets worse if you want to sign Mookie Betts or Benintendi or Devers to a long term contract.</p>
<p>It’s an extremely tough choice Dave Dombrowski finds himself with. Is it reasonable, or realistic even, to squeeze out seven or eight more wins from this roster that has seemed to peter out at 93 over the past two seasons? That argument can be made. But what is the cost of that not happening? What if this team doesn’t add those wins? What if Price isn’t healthy? What if he is?</p>
<p>The Red Sox are going to spend a lot of money in 2018, that much is for certain. What they get for it is less known. So maybe they should spend more. Or maybe that would sink them. The thing about forks in the road is you have to pick a direction because going straight ahead never works. If he&#8217;s not now, Dave Dombrowski is about to become aware of that.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Bob DeChiara &#8211; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/20/the-costs-of-going-all-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Searching For A New Skipper</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/12/on-searching-for-a-new-skipper/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/12/on-searching-for-a-new-skipper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Teeter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=28134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With John Farrell gone, the Red Sox need to be comprehensive in their managerial search.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was indeed fire burning underneath all of that smoke encircling the manager’s office at Fenway Park, as yesterday it was announced that John Farrell’s tenure in Boston is over. Farrell’s ousting is the latest example of how tenuous job security can be for a major league manager, as he won a World Series title, three division championships, and 53 percent of his games as the club’s bench boss, but he won’t get the chance to add to that resume in Boston. It was not all sunshine and rainbows under Farrell. There are the two last place finishes, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/03/05/the-bizarre-history-of-rumored-relationships-between-red-sox-and-media-members/?utm_term=.0cc18525e5cb" target="_blank">romantic relations with media members</a>, and then this year there was the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/05/sports/baseball/boston-red-sox-stealing-signs-yankees.html" target="_blank">Apple Watch use</a> that he was oblivious to and then <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeGiza/status/905530467369275392" target="_blank">snarky about</a>, and his reportedly <a href="http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/trying-times-for-john-farrell-as-boston-red-sox-manager-052317" target="_blank">losing the clubhouse</a> in the early going.</p>
<p>With all that in mind, I think we should recognize that Farrell was generally pretty decent at his job, especially when compared to others. Not great, but simply good. Everything that went wrong this year and in previous years was not directly Farrell’s fault, and won’t necessarily be corrected by hiring a new manager. Thinking otherwise is not productive. While Red Sox fans (and perhaps even the players, coaches and front office members) hope the next manager is better than Farrell, he could easily be worse. Dave Dombrowski needs to tread carefully as he hires his first manager. All of the blame that Farrell has soaked up the last few years will start to trickle into Dombrowski’s suite if the next manager stumbles.</p>
<p>The discussion about possible candidates for the Red Sox’s managerial vacancy are in full swing. After all, Farrell was fired a whole 24-hours ago. Things move fast. I am sure you have seen lists of names that people feel should be considered. You can even <a href="https://twitter.com/enosarris/status/918184192638255104" target="_blank">wager your hard earned cash dollars</a> on who it will be. Of course you can. Maybe we should be monitoring Dombrowski’s bookie. Jokes aside, and at the risk of repeating parts of your Twitter feed, here are the names I have seen/heard as suggestions for the Red Sox’s job opening (in no particular order):</p>
<table width="555" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<colgroup>
<col width="140" />
<col width="122" />
<col width="141" />
<col width="137" /> </colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="140" height="16">
<p class="western" align="center">Hensley Meulens</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="122">
<p class="western" align="center">Joe Girardi</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="141">
<p class="western" align="center">Gary DiSarcina</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="137">
<p class="western" align="center">Manny Acta</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="140" height="16">
<p class="western" align="center">Ruben Amaro Jr.</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="122">
<p class="western" align="center">Brad Ausmus</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="141">
<p class="western" align="center">Ron Gardenhire</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="137">
<p class="western" align="center">Chili Davis</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="140" height="16">
<p class="western" align="center">Alex Cora</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="122">
<p class="western" align="center">Larry Bowa</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="141">
<p class="western" align="center">Buck Showalter</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="137">
<p class="western" align="center">Sandy Alomar Jr.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="bottom">
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="140" height="16">
<p class="western" align="center">Mike Matheny</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="122">
<p class="western" align="center">Gabe Kapler</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="141">
<p class="western" align="center">Jason Varitek</p>
</td>
<td style="background: #ffffff" bgcolor="#ffffff" width="137">
<p class="western" align="center">Dave Martinez</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>That’s 16 names, and I probably missed a name or two that has been floated out there. Interestingly, there appears to be consensus on a few names. As an example, spend an hour on Twitter and it will seem as though Alex Cora already has this job. People (including credible ones) are suggesting Cora is a perfect fit. That is strong. Of course he could be, but it is not at all clear to me what evidence is being used to support this idea. There are certainly nice things being said about Cora, and it is assumed that he embraces the analytical  side of in-game tactics given his time in Houston, but he only has one year of big league coaching experience and hasn’t had to deal with the media. Don’t get me wrong, I am not trying to make a case against Cora – I think he would be a fine manager – nor am I saying that years of major league managing experience and media training are critical attributes. I am just surprised by how quickly and confidently people have jumped to fit Cora for a(nother) Red Sox uniform. If I recall correctly, five years ago, John Farrell seemed like a such a perfect fit that actual major league talent was traded away to acquire him. Now he can’t leave town soon enough.</p>
<blockquote><p>Five years ago, John Farrell seemed like a such a perfect fit that actual major league talent was traded away to acquire him. Now he can’t leave town soon enough.</p></blockquote>
<p>Any candidate is going to have a difficult job to do in Boston. An obligatory mention of the tough media market goes here. After getting past the media everyday, the clubhouse has three hard-headed veterans in Dustin Pedroia, David Price, and Chris Sale, and a group of young players (i.e., Mookie Betts, Xander Bogaerts, Jackie Bradley Jr.) who are expected to bounce back from <a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/10/the-silver-linings/" target="_blank">underperformance on offense</a> in 2017 and take on a more defined leadership role. The veterans can make life very hard for a new manager who does things in a way that goes against their preferences, and there is no way any more slippage in performance from the young core is going to be tolerated.</p>
<p>Of course, the young guys could bounce back for no other reason than natural regression, which might push them to be more vocal in the clubhouse and make the new manager look like a genius, so that is a perk. There is also the fact that the Red Sox are a team with money, being run by Dave Dombrowski. He will go get players he wants. Add a Jake Arrieta to the rotation, along with an extra helping of slugging to the lineup (e.g., J.D. Martinez, Carlos Santana, Joey Votto [<em>swoooon</em>]) and you have the makings of an upper-90s win total stew going, and a stronger chance at winning a postseason series or two &#8211; or three.</p>
<p>For me, the best candidate will be someone who is: (1) receptive to and implements analytically-driven strategies, (2) a strong and clear communicator, (3) able to work with and respects young players’ development, and (4) humble and admits mistakes. This set of characteristics likely rules out a few names from the table above (i.e., Ausmus, Matheny, Bowa, Gardenhire). But the reality is that none of us know much of anything about the managerial characteristics of most of the guys in the table above. We are just guessing and trying to convince ourselves that our personal preference will be better than Farrell. Chances are, barring another Bobby V-esque disaster, we will be going through a similar exercise again in three-to-five years.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Shanna Lockwood &#8211; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/12/on-searching-for-a-new-skipper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Is Sam Travis?</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/05/24/who-is-sam-travis/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/05/24/who-is-sam-travis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cam Ellis]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanley Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Moreland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Travis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=20694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skinny on the new guy on the roster.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime mid-afternoon yesterday, the Red Sox announced that they called up prospect Sam Travis. Travis, a right-handed first baseman taken out of Indiana University in the second round of the 2014 draft, is listed as the team&#8217;s <a href="http://www.soxprospects.com/">third-highest ranked prospect</a> by SoxProspects.com. To compare, SoxProspects.com had him ranked as the 6th-best prospect in 2016, and 17th-best the year before. Calling up a top-prospect like Travis is notable for any team, but it&#8217;d be foolish not to acknowledge that at least <em>some </em>of the expectations for him are probably unrealistic -Travis&#8217; ascension to top-3 prospect benefited greatly from Dave Dombrowski&#8217;s, um, <em>enthusiastic</em> trade approach last offseason. Still, teams calling up top prospects is one of the most fun and exciting aspects of the game, and it&#8217;ll be fascinating to see how a young talent like Travis will have an impact on a talented but underachieving squad. Here&#8217;s the book on Sam Travis, just another example on the ever-growing list of Red Sox players with two first names.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="http://m.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=1220287083&amp;topic_id=8878860&amp;width=400&amp;height=224&amp;property=mlb" width="400" height="224" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><strong>He&#8217;s a very Red Sox-y hitter.</strong></p>
<p>You take a look at Travis&#8217; numbers and you see exactly why the Red Sox drafted him. This year, Travis&#8217; BB% (9.4) mirrors the average of the 2017 Red Sox (9.1) almost perfectly. The strikeouts aren&#8217;t far off either, with Travis&#8217; K% (17.3) being a hair lower than the 2017 Sox average (19.5). While that&#8217;s most likely nothing more than a very convenient coincidence, it highlights the low-strikeout, high-walk plate approach the team has loved so much over the last decade or so.  Here&#8217;s a fun fact: every Red Sox player with at least 100 PAs has 1. a higher BB% than league average (8.8) and 2. all but two (Moreland, JBJ) with 100 PAs have a K% below league average. They make contact and see a lot of pitches, two things that Travis has always done well in the minors.</p>
<p><strong>The Red Sox suddenly need first baseman depth.</strong></p>
<p>Suddenly might be the wrong word here, seeing as Hanley Ramirez has played exactly one (1) game at first base this year. Hanley apparently has lingering shoulder issues that prevent him from playing the field, or <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzDYgRc6eic">has just realized that DH-ing is a pretty dope gig</a>. Either way, Mitch Moreland needs to sleep eventually, so this is where we find ourselves. The general consensus seems to be he&#8217;ll be the platoon guy the team envisioned Ramirez being, only now we don&#8217;t have to sit around and play that awkward game where we pretend we&#8217;re waiting for Hanley to be healthy enough to play first again. Everyone&#8217;s happier this way.</p>
<p><strong>He could (theoretically) help with the power issues.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="http://www.milb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=1399803083&amp;width=400&amp;height=224&amp;property=milb" width="400" height="224" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>Through two months, the 2017 Red Sox have a .141 ISO (26th in MLB), a .408 SLG (20th in MLB) and have hit 38 home runs (29th in MLB). Weirdly enough, though, (<a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/05/22/the-red-soxs-brutal-batting/">like we pointed out earlier this week</a>) the Sox are an hitting the ball at an elite level. Through his three years in the minors, Travis has put up pretty decent power numbers, posting an ISO over .140 (what&#8217;s roughly considered an average hitter) each season, and at least once at every level besides Double-A (.136 there, though). He also puts up a SLG in the mid-to-high .400&#8217;s along his various minor league stops. Aaron Judge he is not, but the Red Sox could use all the power help they can get.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Jasen Vinlove &#8211; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/05/24/who-is-sam-travis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dave Dombrowski and the Three-Year Window</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/20/dave-dombrowski-and-the-three-year-window/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/20/dave-dombrowski-and-the-three-year-window/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Kory]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Cherington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=14200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which a bus analogy is used. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">Yesterday, Rob Bradford of WEEI spoke to Mookie Betts and Xander Bogaerts at the Boston Baseball Writers’ Dinner. He <a href="http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2017/01/19/wondering-if-red-sox-mookie-betts-are-talking-contract-extension-not-a-peep/" target="_blank">asked them</a> if they were interested in signing contract extensions to stay in Boston. There was slightly more nuance to their answers but in essence both said &#8220;no.&#8221; That puts a fine point on where the Red Sox are right now as an organization. Bogaerts has three more seasons (including 2017) in Boston before reaching free agency. Betts has one more than that. Additionally, David Price has two seasons before he can opt out. Hanley Ramirez has two seasons before his contract expires. Rick Porcello has three. Chris Sale has three more seasons on his deal as well. You may be sensing a theme here. This group will be here for about three seasons. After that? Who knows, but it’ll likely involve massive turnover. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">Of course most teams don’t have their core locked up to eight-year deals. While it would be wonderful if the Red Sox signed Jackie Bradley, Betts, Bogaerts, and heck, Andrew Benintendi to multi-year contract extensions, that’s probably not particularly realistic. But once this tide recedes, we’re still going to need a place to sail our boats.</span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">The issue is the timing. In three seasons&#8217; time the majority of the important players on this Red Sox team will hit free agency. Ideally a franchise would have minor league players ready to take over as players on the major league roster depart, but Dave Dombrowski’s aggressive use of prospects to acquire major league players over the past season and a half has cut the depth out of the Red Sox system. It could be replenished to some extent over the next three seasons, but the draft and the rules of the international amateur market don’t work to the Red Sox&#8217;s advantage like they once did. Boston will be able to add young talent, but draft position, pool money, and international signing limits will combine to make it very unlikely they’ll be able to put themselves into a similar position to the one they were in at the start of Dave Dombrowski’s tenure. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">So <span class="aBn"><span class="aQJ">in three years</span></span> when the above players&#8217; contracts end, who will pick up the torch? Over the last year and a half, Dombrowski has traded away Logan Allen, Javier Guerra, Carlos Asuaje, Manuel Margot, both Basabe brothers, Maricio Dubon, Josh Pennington, Pat Light, and Anderson Espinoza. That’s a ridiculous amount of talent to give up, and that’s not even the complete list because I didn’t mention the four guys he traded away in the Chris Sale trade. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">The Chris Sale trade. Oh man, the Chris Sale trade. That deal made some things clear. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">Dave Dombrowski is clearly a different guy than Ben Cherington. His first off-season told us that much. There is no way if you tied Ben Cherington naked to the front of a city bus and put giant crabs on his nipples that he makes the Craig Kimbrel trade. Maybe he might sign David Price. Probably not, but we can squint hard enough that our noses bleed and convince ourselves it could be possible. But the Kimbrel deal would never, ever happen under Cherington’s watch, I don’t care how sharp the crabs’ pinchers are. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">So if the Kimbrel deal was a planet too far for Cherington, the Sale trade is in another galaxy entirely. Let’s look at the Sale trade for a second and all the things it tells us about Dombrowski’s Red Sox. Sale is a big star, he’s a big name, he’s under contract for three more years, and he cost the Red Sox their best prospects, but notably nobody off their major league roster. That&#8217;s a lot to take in, but I think it says something important about where the Red Sox are right now. It says they’re trying to win right now and for the next few seasons, and any time after that may as well be in another century. Or in a beach house on the edge of an eroding cliff. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">Ideally a baseball organization rolls along like a bus. It stops every now and again for some people to get off, but usually others get on as well. The job of the GM is to keep all the seats filled with quality players. The perfect case scenario would see an almost seamless addition of players from the minor league system to the major league roster, with the occasional free agent signing as needed. The Red Sox were pretty close to that ideal, about as close as could reasonably be asked, when Dombrowski took over. But even if we don’t go back that far, the entire 2017 outfield, shortstop, and catcher all feature young cost-controlled above average talent. With David Price and Rick Porcello standing at the front of the rotation and Kimbrel already in place in the pen, there wasn’t much need for big additions. The team had payroll space, but it also (miraculously) still had a very good farm system with talent percolating up toward the majors. The bus was full, and even though a few guys were getting off, there were more than that many waiting to get on. This was the best of both worlds. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">The Sale deal didn’t blow that all to high hell by itself, but it’s close. The major league team is undoubtedly better now with Sale on the roster, but down the road they’re short four prospects, two of which were as likely as any to be able to step in and help the major league roster. It’s a delicate balance that was built by Cherington, and Dombrowski has trashed it by trading away (at least) 15 minor leaguers who could have combined to give the Red Sox up to 105 player seasons.</span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">This is roster building by sledgehammer and it’s not my style. But that doesn&#8217;t mean it can’t work. The problem with any free agent contract is that by spending money in one place it prevents you from spending it elsewhere. However, if payroll is no concern, if you could sign Pablo Sandoval to a five-year contract in one off-season and then Manny Machado two off-seasons later, then the only real issue becomes filling each roster spot with the most talent you can pack into it. That’s sort of what Dave Dombrowski has tried to do. He’s probably not a dollars-per-WAR kinda guy, but if you look at it that way just for a second, Dombrowski has tried to pack the most WAR into each roster spot he can. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">He’s not counting pennies either. There’s no sense waiting for minor leaguers to show up and then waiting longer to see if they can hack it in the big leagues when you can fix the problem far quicker than that. If giving up Logan Allen will get Craig Kimbrel in a Boston jersey, fine. The problem is that there is a limit. No team, even the Red Sox, can spend infinitely. That goes for trading minor leaguers for major league talent as well, because eventually the farm system dries up. </span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><span class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-s1">There is something to be said for having everyone on the roster peak at the same time. It’s how the 2001 Mariners won 116 games. Even better example: it’s how the 2013 Red Sox won the World Series. The next three seasons could be that level of special for Boston. If they are we’ll hold them close, like we do with the 2013 champs. But even if, what happens after that? Cherington had a plan. So did Epstein before him. There’s still time for a plan, but right now it certainly appears as if in three seasons the core of the team is going leave and there won’t be anyone waiting to get on the bus.</span></p>
<p class="m_8194903763001565889gmail-p1"><em>Photo by USA Today Sports Images</em></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="yj6qo ajU"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/01/20/dave-dombrowski-and-the-three-year-window/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Sale Is a Luxury the Red Sox Didn&#8217;t Need</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/14/chris-sale-is-a-luxury-the-red-sox-didnt-need/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/14/chris-sale-is-a-luxury-the-red-sox-didnt-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Kory]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=12223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Sale is great, but the Red Sox made a mistake in gutting their farm. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">Red Sox President Dave Dombrowski’s major moves last season &#8212; signing David Price to the largest contract ever given to a starting pitcher and bringing in all-world closer Craig Kimbrel for a bounty of minor league prospects &#8212; were about winning now as much as winning later. After all, Kimbrel isn’t just all-world, he’s all-world signed for three seasons. Price wasn’t just the best starter available, he was the best starter available signed for three years (with maybe four more depending on his opt-out). Those two guys were going to be in Boston for the near term along with Mookie Betts, Xander Bogaerts, Jackie Bradley, at least one of the Red Sox&#8217;s young catchers and Dustin Pedroia. But that wasn’t all. The team had a long-term plan with Andrew Benintendi, Yoan Moncada, Michael Kopech, Rafael Devers, and a host of other youngsters on the way to Boston over the next half decade. The Red Sox could win now <em>and</em> later as the next wave was on the way to take the handoff. The Red Sox were set to dominate the American League over the next decade in a way not seen since the late-90s/early-aughts Yankee teams. </span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">But long term isn’t Dave Dombrowski’s modus operandi, and in the end he couldn’t help himself. He saw the shiny toy dangled in front of him in Chris Sale, and he grabbed it. This isn’t to take anything away from Sale. He’s fantastic. He’ll probably be wonderful in Boston. But the Red Sox didn’t need him. They already had a very good rotation. In fact, it wasn’t difficult to squint and see the 2017 rotation ending up better than the 2016 rotation. Sure, Porcello takes a reasonable step back, but it’s offset by Price’s improvement. The Red Sox get a good season out of Eduardo Rodriguez, Drew Pomeranz is then a number three starter cast as the number four starter (and if he pitches more like the San Diego version of Pomeranz he’s a number two), and then the Red Sox have Steven Wright and Clay Buchholz to hold down the number five spot. That’s a very good rotation. Put that in front of the league’s leading offense (or something reasonably close to that) and watch the wins roll in. Chris Sale is fantastic, but the marginal value added by bringing him to Boston isn’t great. </span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">But Dave Dombrowski doesn’t do marginal value. He likes good players. He likes big names. Chris Sale is a good player. He’s a big name. He’ll look beautiful on a ticket stub. But the Red Sox really didn’t need him in 2017. They didn’t need him in 2018 either, with Price, Porcello, Rodriguez, Pomeranz, and Wright all under team control. Heck, all those guys with the lone exception of Pomeranz are under contract in 2019, too.  </span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p2">Perhaps the craziest part of all this is that most everything went right for the Red Sox in 2016. There was nothing forcing or even pointing the front office in the direction of making a big change. Price was good, Betts was incredible, Bogaerts was very good, David Ortiz was one of the best hitters in baseball, and the Red Sox got helping hands from two of the three guys who helped tank the 2015 season in Porcello and Hanley Ramirez (Pablo Sandoval, for better or worse, missed the season due to injury). It was speculated the Red Sox would try to dump Ramirez’s remaining three years on someone else, but they didn’t, and Hanley dedicated himself in the off-season and had a hell of a year. He became a serviceable defensive first baseman, something anyone who watched him in left field last season wouldn’t have thought possible, and he mashed at the plate. Suddenly the next two seasons of his deal look like a good thing instead of a disaster. Porcello’s turnaround was even more impressive. He won the damn Cy Young award after being below average in 2015. You could have made an incredible amount of money, maybe more than Rick Porcello’s contract, betting on that. I’m not convinced he’ll be that good again in 2017, but even a lesser version of 2016 Rick Porcello would be fantastic, and it fits even more so if Price’s runs allowed fall more in line with his peripheral stats. What do you need to add to all that? A reliever maybe. A few long-term deals for young stars.</p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">The Red Sox are coming off 93 wins and a division title, and possess a young team headed into their prime and an amazing farm system set to bear fruit through the next decade. It all looked bright, so, so bright. This is THE set up. It’s what front offices strive to have. This is Theo’s wet dream.</span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">This is why I can’t shake the oddness of the Sale deal. What’s the difference between what Sale brings and what the pitcher he bumps out of the rotation brings? Two wins? Three? You might argue more than that by saying, ‘Well what if Buchholz is just awful?” or “What if Wright is still hurt or can’t regain his first half of 2016 form?” and those are both reasonable questions individually, but here’s the thing. The Red Sox have both those guys! So the answer to the first question is move Buchholz and his one-year deal out of the rotation and put Wright in. The answer to the second question is move Wright out of the rotation and put Buchholz in. Point is, the floor for the fifth spot in the rotation was pretty high, say one-to-three wins above replacement. Removing those guys for Sale by trading your two best prospects (and two other valuable prospects as well) is an extreme move, and severely alters the long term plan and the farm system’s ability to supplement the major league team. </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1">One of the main reasons the Red Sox paid David Price over $200 million was so they <i>wouldn’t</i> have to make a farm system destroying deal like this.</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">The other aspect of this that bothers me even more is this: one of the main reasons the Red Sox paid David Price over $200 million was so they <i>wouldn’t</i> have to make a farm system destroying deal like this. Recall last off-season when Dombrowski decided he had to have an “ace” (the irony being the eventual 2016 Cy Young award winner was already on his staff) but determined the pitchers on the trade market (including Sale) were too expensive in terms of prospects. So instead he issued the largest contract ever given to a starting pitcher. And now, <span class="aBn"><span class="aQJ">one year later</span></span>, now with “Cy” Porcello and Pomeranz, he blows up the farm system anyway. Does this seem like the workings of someone with a plan, or the meanderings of a ten-year-old in a mall whose parents just gave him a $20 bill and told him to “have fun?” </span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">You don’t even have to go back to Price’s contract, though, because come to think of it, it’s also why the Sox dealt their best pitching prospect in Anderson Espinoza for Pomeranz at the deadline (and then didn’t rescind the deal when they had the chance after the Padres medical shenanigans were revealed). The Red Sox said they needed a starter (they did) and got the biggest name available at least in part because they liked that he was under contract for two more seasons beyond 2016. And then, after those two deals, they blew the hell out of the farm system for Chris Sale anyway. Oof. </span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">That’s really the problem with many of these Dombrowski trades and signings. They’re fine in a vacuum, devoid of context. Is Chris Sale worth Yoan Moncada, Michael Kopech and Luis Alexander Basabe? Yes. Is he worth it to a team that just paid David Price $200 million and traded Espinoza for Pomeranz? That’s a much different question. Is David Price worth $200+ million and an opt-out? He can be if spending that money gets you value on the field, fills out the rotation, and prevents you from deconstructing the farm system. Part of the reason to pay Price and accept the pain of losing Espinoza for Pomeranz is to hold on to players like Kopech, Basabe, and Moncada because they could be valuable major leaguers one day, but also because they could be used to acquire major leaguers the team actually needs further down the line.</span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">So here we are with a 2017 Red Sox team better on paper than their 2016 counterparts, but really, if we’re being truthful, only marginally so, and now the team’s farm system has gone from one of the best in the game to one of the worst. The object isn’t to collect shiny prospects, so that in and of itself hardly matters. What does matter is the long term plan, and Dombrowski’s long term plan seems to be win now and who cares if everything becomes completely unsustainable and falls apart after that.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1">Dombrowski has put everything on the next two-to-three seasons and after that, the piper will be waiting. It didn’t have to be that way.</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">The argument for all of this is that the front office’s goal is to win a World Series, and that’s what Dombrowski is trying to do. But actually, that’s not really the goal. The goal is really to win lots of World Series, to be a dynasty, to be in position to win every year. That is admittedly incredibly difficult. With free agency, the crapshoot that is the draft, the rollercoaster of player development, injuries, and all the other aspects that go into creating a roster for the long term, in the end it’s much easier to just load up and go for it now, right now, and worry about tomorrow tomorrow. That’s what the Red Sox have done. </span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><span class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-s1">Bizarrely, though, they were on the precipice of being a World Series contender for the next half-decade. They didn’t need to go all in. The major league roster was, with a few tweaks, set. They had done the hard part! They were already there. They didn’t need to liquidate the farm for one win-now player. But they did and now, instead of long term success, there is turnover ahead. The team has no choice. Dombrowski has put everything on the next two-to-three seasons and after that, the piper will be waiting. It didn’t have to be that way. Indeed it could have been a whole lot better, a whole lot more fulfilling, and a whole lot more fun. But now it’s the next few seasons and (not or) bust. And that’s why the Sale deal was a bad idea. Winning now isn’t the hard part. Winning in perpetuity is. It’s a shame Dave Dombrowski never realized that. </span></p>
<p class="m_6869116098893719263gmail-p1"><em>Photo by Kim Klement/USA Today Sports Images</em></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="yj6qo ajU"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/14/chris-sale-is-a-luxury-the-red-sox-didnt-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read Sox: Chris Sale, Prospects and Winter Meetings Madness</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/08/read-sox-chris-sale-prospects-and-winter-meetings-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/08/read-sox-chris-sale-prospects-and-winter-meetings-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Slavin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Read Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koji Uehara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Thornburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoan Moncada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=11897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Chris Sale, Tyler Thornburg and the very nature of Ding Dong City. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Chris Sale will pitch his next home game at Fenway. Yoan Moncada and Michael Kopech and their immensely bright futures were jettisoned to make way for the newest Red Sox ace. How’s that for a Winter Meetings splash? This edition of Read Sox will, naturally, give attention to the blockbuster deal and its coverage. There will be no dumb jokes involved &#8220;sales&#8221; or &#8220;prices&#8221; as they relate to Red Sox pitchers. Promise.</em></p>
<p>The hours after the news of the Sale trade broke on Tuesday were predictably filled with Takes, both hot and otherwise. Most of Red Sox Nation – myself included – is thrilled by the prospect of the current Cy Young holder as <em>a number three starter</em>. Remember when this was supposed to be a <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/2016/11/dave_dombrowski_sets_low_expectations_for_red_sox_offseason">quiet offseason</a>? It is clear now that a 6-foot-6 asterisk was attached to that proclamation in the shape of Chris Sale.</p>
<p>Much of the national media now has the Sox pegged as the odds-on favorite in the American League. Sports Illustrated and <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/why-the-red-sox-are-favorites-to-go-to-the-world-series-after-the-chris-sale-trade/">CBSSports’ Jonah Keri</a> (RIP Grantland), opines that the move puts the team in the driver’s seat in the AL. Ben Lindbergh over at The Ringer <a href="https://theringer.com/mlb-trade-boston-red-sox-chicago-white-sox-chris-sale-yoan-moncada-140290af16d7#.badebyled">agrees with his former co-worker</a>. Most all fans and baseball analysts liked the trade for, really, both colors of Sox. <a href="http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/rob-bradford/2016/12/06/bigger-pedro-chris-sale-deal-unparalleled-r-0">Rob Bradford makes the case at WEEI.com</a> that this was the biggest trade in recent Red Sox history. The closest to a negative reaction to the trade, from what I read, was <a href="http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/john-tomase/2016/12/06/its-possible-love-chris-sale-trade-hate-what-i">this column by WEEI’s John Tomase</a> fretting about Dave Dombrowski’s notable propensity to empty the prospect war chest in order to achieve the all-important Win Now. Even Tomase’s gripe is more with the totality of Dombrowski’s work, and he acknowledges the boon that is acquiring Chris Sale.</p>
<p>There is a clear and not-hard-to-decipher consensus that the trade makes the Red Sox demonstrably better heading into the 2017 season. And, considering the Nationals on Wednesday traded the White Sox arguably baseball’s top pitching prospect in Lucas Giolito for <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSpankyEaton">a guy with ‘Spanky’ in his Twitter handle</a>, the price the Red Sox paid for Sale seems relatively reasonable.</p>
<p>Tuesday saw the Red Sox deal four of the nine top players in the farm system (including Luis Alexander Basabe in the move for Sale and Mauricio Dubon for reliever Tyler Thornburg), per SoxProspects.com. So in a way, Tomase is totally right: the cupboard looks pretty bare. Rafael Devers and 18-year-old Jason Groome are the two remaining genuinely promising (though you may be bullish on some others) players in the minor leagues.</p>
<p>That being said, let’s remember a significant reason for this truth: a lot of former prospects are performing at the Major League level! Andrew Benintendi looked ready to play an everyday role in left field in his limited and injury-interrupted audition late in 2016. Eduardo Rodriguez doesn’t turn 24 until April and posted a 3.24 ERA in 14 starts after returning from Pawtucket in July. Mookie Betts and Xander Bogaerts are All-Stars that just turned 24 in October. (Aside: my heart grew three sizes after realizing that Mookie and Xander were born six days apart as I imagined them throwing joint birthday parties. Anyways.)</p>
<p>All of this is to say that the Red Sox are young, are good right now, and just got better right now. As <a href="http://www.overthemonster.com/2016/12/6/13858002/chris-sale-trade-red-sox-white-sox-jackie-bradley-andrew-benintendi-yoan-moncada-eduardo-rodriguez">Ben Buchanan lays out for Over the Monster</a>, this trade was the best way for the team to make a move for Sale if they were going to do so; no Jackie Bradley Jr. or Rodriguez or other major league talent was involved. They just took what was a 93-win team and added probably the best non-Clayton Kershaw lefty in the world. That feels pretty good.</p>
<p>Before all that craziness transpired, the Red Sox had made a trade with the Brewers for reliever Tyler Thornburg, who threw 67 innings last year for Milwaukee to the tune of a 2.15 ERA and .940 WHIP. Craig Kimbrel has a very talented new set-up man.</p>
<p>The more minor trade has an array of interesting consequences for the team going forward, both significant and trivial. For one, the trade included Travis Shaw, meaning Ding Dong City either a. needs a new mayor or b. is a mobile municipality of a kind heretofore unknown. Also, the Red Sox sent Mauricio Dubon to the Brewers, breaking the heart of colleague Matt Collins but perhaps more importantly allowing for <a href="https://twitter.com/RedSox_Thoughts/status/806170275268194304">this magnificent Twitter interaction</a> to occur.</p>
<p>From a baseball standpoint, the combination of the two deals makes clear the team’s commitment to and faith in Pablo Sandoval playing third base next season. <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/clubhouse_insider/2016/12/dombrowski_we_think_pablo_sandoval_is_ready_to_come_back">As Jason Mastrodonato reports in the Herald</a>, Dombrowski thinks Sandoval is “ready to come back.” And Sandoval seems to be too. In fact, he might even be in the Best Shape Of His Life.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Check out the slimmed-down Pablo Sandoval <a href="https://t.co/v0YffLEA9G">https://t.co/v0YffLEA9G</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RedSox?src=hash">#RedSox</a> <a href="https://t.co/8s6AWWscc8">pic.twitter.com/8s6AWWscc8</a></p>
<p>— ESPNBoston (@ESPNBoston) <a href="https://twitter.com/ESPNBoston/status/806524081742888960">December 7, 2016</a></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2016/12/07/have-red-sox-gutted-their-farm-system/g4UospSQR1JCCqInN3xLRP/story.html">As Alex Speier points out in the Globe</a>, the hefty price for Thornburg reflects the incredibly high cost and value of relievers in today’s climate. Andrew Miller’s postseason messed with some peoples’ heads, apparently. Since Alex published his piece, the Cubs traded noted masher of baseballs and very promising talent Jorge Soler to the Royals for reliever Wade Davis. As I&#8217;m writing this, the Yankees just signed Aroldis Chapman for five years and $86 million. So, yeah. Go back in time and train yourself to be a set-up man.</p>
<p>Finally, the Thornburg acquisition closed the door on the possibility of Koji Uehara returning in 2017, Dombrowski said. This is not a shocking development but a sad one nonetheless. Thanks for the memories Koji, we&#8217;ll miss you and your logic-defying sinker.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TrVMVCxC7-o" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><em>Photo by USA Today Sports Images</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/12/08/read-sox-chris-sale-prospects-and-winter-meetings-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
