<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boston &#187; Evan Longoria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/tag/evan-longoria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com</link>
	<description>Bringing BP-quality analysis to Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Roster Recap: Josh Rutledge Gets Gone</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/18/roster-recap-josh-rutledge-gets-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/18/roster-recap-josh-rutledge-gets-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Cowett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Longoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Rutledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troy Tulowitzki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=33352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another middle infielder? My favorite!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you guys, but I am positively ecstatic to bring you yet another Roster Recap of another one of the Red Sox&#8217;s cabal of middling middle infielders! Are you excited? Yeah, I didn&#8217;t really expect you to be. I&#8217;m just happy you&#8217;re here, really. I know, I wish J.D. Martinez would sign already too.</p>
<p>If you think this offseason has been dragging, well, Josh Rutledge was on the Red Sox for <em>three</em> seasons. Doesn&#8217;t really seem like it, but yes, he indeed logged 259 plate appearances with this team since 2015. And if that wasn&#8217;t enough, he was placed on the 60-day disabled list last year after he underwent surgery for patellar tendonitis, then he was optioned to Pawtucket, and after that, he elected to enter free agency. The Rockies then signed him to a minor league deal, but he was eligible to be picked in the Rule 5 draft, and wouldn&#8217;t you know it, the Red Sox brought him right back with the 14th pick in that draft. That seems like a bit much to bring back a guy with a career .695 OPS and a mediocre glove, but sometimes you just don&#8217;t understand the Red Sox.</p>
<p>Towards the tail-end of spring training, Rutledge suffered a left hamstring strain, and hit the 10-day DL to start the season. He didn&#8217;t return until April 25th, then had to be sat for a few games in early June thanks to dehydration. Then he had to be put on the 7-day concussion DL in late June, and spoke of &#8220;persistent soreness&#8221; in his hip. By the end of July, Rutledge was (once again) on the 60-day DL, having needed surgery on that hip, and he underwent the knife in late August. The Red Sox outrighted him this winter.</p>
<p>Admittedly, that&#8217;s a lot, and if you think that was exhausting to read, imagine writing it. Or watch him try to hit. That&#8217;s pretty draining too.</p>
<h4>What Went Right</h4>
<p>He did a cool thing here and there, I guess.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/m/1491405083" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>Otherwise, not much else. He did get paid to play baseball professionally, which is a pretty good thing no matter how you frame it.</p>
<h4>What Went Wrong</h4>
<p>His medical history is so lengthy and filled with injuries that even glass thinks he&#8217;s too fragile. 2017 was no exception.</p>
<p>He also posted a .558 OPS in 118 PA, and racked up a -0.3 WARP. Yikes.</p>
<h4>What To Expect</h4>
<p>Whatever he does, it won&#8217;t be with the Red Sox. Rutledge signed a minor-league deal with the San Francisco Giants in December, so now he&#8217;s behind such players as Evan Longoria and Pablo Sandoval. Hopefully, the Red Sox don&#8217;t feel like reclaiming him this time, and let the less injury-prone guys on the bench do the heavy lifting when it comes to being a part-time player. This isn&#8217;t even a &#8220;if you love something, let it go&#8221; situation &#8212; the Red Sox just need to let go.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Winslow Townson &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/18/roster-recap-josh-rutledge-gets-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP Boston Unfiltered: The Big Dombrowski</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/12/01/bp-boston-unfiltered-the-big-dombrowski/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/12/01/bp-boston-unfiltered-the-big-dombrowski/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Grosnick]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Boston Unfiltered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Revere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Gardner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Matusz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Carrasco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Farquhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Longoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joakim Soria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jose Fernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=2985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's get weird with what Dave Dombrowski's offseason could've looked like. Sort of.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Every year, fans and armchair GMs look at the work a front office does, and they say “I could do better.” It never fails.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Every year, Max Rieper of Royals Review at SB Nation runs a simulation of the offseason, asking 30 persons (and associated helpers) to play at being General Manager of all 30 MLB franchises. It&#8217;s an enjoyable exercise only tangentially related to reality, where bloggers of all stripes play-act as General Managers, negotiate trades and free agent deals with other real people, and attempt to re-shape an organization int heir own image.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">(We also dialed it back to the start of the 2015 offseason, so no Craig Kimbrel trade took place in our alternate reality.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Last year, I hired a team of brilliant minds from Beyond the Box Score to help me run the Shadow Red Sox. The strategy: attempt to emulate Ben Cherington and company’s massive braintrust, in order to turn around a franchise that went from first-to-worst in a down 2014. <a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/07/28/a-kinder-gentler-alternate-red-sox-reality/" target="_blank">We traded for Giancarlo Stanton. We signed Kenta Maeda. We went wild.</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Somehow, I was brought back to helm the Shadow Red Sox once again this season. But in the era of Dave Dombrowski, I knew I must play a bigger, better role. Like Dombrowski, expectations were high – my team’s handling of the Red Sox’ faux offseason in the previous year earned praise from most corners of the simulation. I was expected, like Dombrowski, to turn the team around from a bottom-of-the-East finish.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I promised myself that I would stick to a plan.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The plan was a simple one: I would fix the Red Sox using the primary resources at my disposal: the best farm system in baseball (suck it, BP Wrigleyville) and a bunch of cash. I would make the Red Sox relevant, competitive in 2016, but also able to change and adapt if the team did not see immediate success. I was assigned a budget of $204 million, which I think was higher than the real-world budget for the Sox, but not too far off.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Getting into specifics, my plan had a few key components:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Trade for an ace</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Acquire an ace in free agency</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Fix the bullpen</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Upgrade in an outfield corner</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Rid the team of Pablo Sandoval’s contract</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Sounds pretty simple, right?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">My primary free agent targets were threefold, and they all had something in common: no qualifying offers. They were:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">David Price</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Yoenis Cespedes</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Ben Zobrist</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">As the simulation was about to start, I reached out to a number of teams for my “trade for an ace” strategy. Since trade talks take actual time, I knew I had to act fast. I reached out to the Indians (Kluber), Mets (pick a guy), Marlins (Fernandez) and Rays (Archer) for initial talks. The Indians weren’t all that excited about Kluber, but talks quickly shifted to Carlos Carrasco or Danny Salazar. They expressed interest in JBJ (actually, almost 10 teams contacted me about him) and Christian Vazquez.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Since I’ve been doing a lot of research on the Indians for an upcoming project, I had a few pet guys I wanted to add to any potential deal. I tried to ask for the moon, in my eyes, by including a top-end prospect as part of the deal as well. After all, I was willing to offer an immediate starter with upside, JBJ and Vazzy.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">After a little back and forth, we worked out this deal:</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Carlos Carrasco, Clint Frazier, Shawn Armstrong, Yandy Diaz, and Mike Clevinger from Cleveland for Jackie Bradley Jr., Christian Vazquez, Henry Owens, Garin Cecchini, and Robbie Ross</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I couldn’t believe that I got Frazier in this deal with the Indians&#8217; braintrust: I think he’s a top-25 prospect. So, I had dealt away much of my MLB-ready depth, but I actually ADDED to the team’s prospect stock, acquired a No. 2 starter, nabbed a guy in Armstrong who could be a late-inning reliever, and got flyers on two guys that I think can be good major-leaguers. Great start, and the “best” trade of the offseason, in my view. Oh, and we’re way under the identified $200 million budget.</span></p>
<ul>
<li><del><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Trade for an ace</span></del></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">(Oh, I exercised options on Ortiz and Buchholz, and non-tendered Cook, Ogando, and Varvaro. But that’s boring)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Elsewhere, chaos ensued. Miami took on loads of money to acquire Lucas Giolito and Trea Turner from Washington (lol). Pittsburgh started a complete teardown (we talked a little about a McCutchen trade).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Now it was time to cut costs.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Elniery Garcia from Philadelphia for Allen Craig and Joe Kelly</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Allen Craig is making a lot of money, and I did NOT want to pay him. Giving up Joe Kelly was a small price to pay to make him go away, and I took on a prospect I do not feel strongly about. But with Owens and Kelly out of the picture, it was becoming more mission-critical to add another solid starter.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Unfortunately, the free agent market for starting pitching was … it wasn’t good, that’s for sure. We&#8217;ll get to more of that later, but no starter is worth more than $35 million per year.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I kept going back and forth with the Marlins about Jose Fernandez, and quickly found out just how much they valued Yoan Moncada. While I really like Moncada, I also really like Jose Fernandez. We worked out a deal focusing on Moncada and Andrew Benintendi, and yes, I know that’s a big package. Before finalizing the deal, I tried to swap out Clint Frazier for Benintendi. I prefer AB to CF, but the Marlins felt the reverse.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Jose Fernandez from Miami for Yoan Moncada, Clint Frazier, Michael Chavis, Austin Rei, and Nick Longhi</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Ah, now we’re Dombrowski-ing. Two potential top-25 prospects, plus Chavis, plus two other pieces, but suddenly I have my coveted True Ace. And he’s cheap! This is where I start to get greedy, imagining a rotation of Fernandez, Price, Carrasco, Eduardo, and Buchholz. I crack my knuckles. I get to work.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I find out that David Price is in line for a huge deal, one that would eventually be worth $259 million dollars. That’s $37 million per year over seven years.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I slowly back out of the negotiation room.</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><del><span style="font-weight: 400">Trade for an ace</span></del></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Sign an ace in free agency</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     <del> </del></span><del><span style="font-weight: 400">Trade for another ace, I guess</span></del></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I kept in on several free agent pitchers: Zack Greinke would eventually price himself out of my range (more on that in a minute), and I wasn’t high enough on Zimmermann or Cueto to make a major offer there. But, the rotation I now had (Fernandez, Carrasco, Ed, Buchholz, Porcello) would work just fine. I actually, despite talking with others on trades (what can I get for Porcello and cash) and inquiring on mid-level free agents (Marco Estrada!), eventually chose to roll with this rotation. We had six starters (we kept Miley also!), which will be great after Buchholz’s elbow eventually detonates.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">New plan: spend loads of money on free agent outfielders. Maybe two. A big upgrade on Rusney Castillo, and a replacement for JBJ. Oh, and maybe I can engage the Marlins on Giancarlo Stanton? Maybe Jason Heyward AND Cespedes?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">In the meantime, I started fielding some calls on relievers, and trying to find a taker for Panda. Oh! If I was going to move Sandoval, I’d need a third baseman, right? I considered pushing Hanley over to third, but also was completely willing to roll with Yandy Diaz there to start the season. Then again, that’s not very Dombrowski. Maybe I should ask in on some Pablo replacements?</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox sign Brian Matusz to a two-year, $8 million contract</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Bullpen is fixed!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Or … at least we have a lefty. I was very surprised to see him non-tendered, but hey, this gave me another idea. “Can I destroy the rest of the AL East? Can I damage my rivals while making myself stronger.” The answer, eventually, would be a decisive “maybe.”</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Scott Lieser from Milwaukee for Pablo Sandoval and Javier Guerra</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Before you judge me too harshly, keep in mind that at this point, I really thought I could acquire two premium outfielders, or maybe still make a run at Greinke. To do that, I wanted to make sure that I not only had salary space, but that a long, expensive contract could come off the books. That meant ditching Pablo. And the best way to do that, was to package him with a prospect people actually wanted. Guerra’s mostly blocked, but I still would’ve rather dealt him for value … but I consider this selling him for the remainder of Pablo’s contract, or about $75 million.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Danny Farquhar from Seattle for Devin Marrero</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">This is <em>not</em> a value trade. This is an attempt to get another relief arm that could be good, in exchange for a guy who probably has no real role on the team. It was either back to the minors, or lose him in Rule 5. We’ve still got Holt, and we’d get a replacement that I think has a little more upside later.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox sign Tommy Hunter to a two-year, $10 million contract</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">In hindsight, I’m afraid I overpaid here. I’m desperate to add live arms to the bullpen, but also to give the team depth and different looks. Hunter’s bad luck on HR in Chicago didn’t faze me, but for this money, I’d hope you could get a .7-win reliever. Not sure that’s Hunter. But he’s an improvement over, say, Alexi Ogando.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">We still need an outfielder, and I’ve been sufficiently scared off my top choices. Jason Heyward would eventually get 11 years and over $300 million. Cespedes would get $200 million as well. Alex Gordon took a discount to stay in Kansas City.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox sign Chris Davis to a five-year, $115 million contract</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Meet your new right fielder. If there’s one hallmark of my two-year tenure as Fake Red Sox GM, it’s that you should never be beholden to traditional position restraints … especially when you have a guy who has proven competence outside his normal realm. Davis has been successful enough as a right fielder in Baltimore, that I’m comfortable leaving him there until 2017, in which time Hanley can shift to DH, and Davis can reclaim first base.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">… did I mention that Hanley’s getting every opportunity at first base? I gave serious consideration about moving him back to third, just in case the team can’t acquire a decent third baseman – or maybe even trying Davis there for an extended look. Maybe I should go get a third baseman.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox sign Joakim Soria to a three-year, $33 million contract</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Eleven million per season is a lot, and I don’t care how good you are. But despite offering a decent amount for Aroldis Chapman, I really didn’t have any good leads on closers, and closers are typically pretty great relievers. I feel a lot less comfortable giving up prospects for closers than I do money, but this one could sting in year three.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">This actually completes the team’s revamped bullpen. I expect it to look something like this on Opening Day:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">CL: Joakim Soria<br />
</span>SU: Koji Uehara<br />
SU: Junichi Tazawa<br />
MR: Brian Matusz<br />
MR: Tommy Hunter<br />
MR: Danny Farquhar<br />
MR: Jean Machi<br />
MR: Shawn Armstrong<br />
LR: Wade Miley</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">It’s not perfect, but it’s a lot better than what we were working with in 2015, and I think a lot of the guys like Layne, Aro, etc. can work in the minors, and you can play a game of “who’s doing well now” versus “oh crap, we have no one good.” No Craig Kimbrel, though &#8230; that&#8217;s kind of a bummer.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I’d end up exploring a few more moves (Marco Estrada, now that I broke the seal and signed someone with a QO, trading for AJ Ramos, selling Rick Porcello low), but this finalized the pitching staff, more or less.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">But this isn’t a Big Dombrowski. We need to convert prospect depth into high-end talent – even more than we already have – to make this a Big Dombrowski. And, ideally, we should crush a rival in the process.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Evan Longoria from Tampa Bay for Rafael Devers, Manny Margot, Rusney Castillo, Brian Johnson, and $30 million</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">There we go. I can certainly see how some people would see this as an overpay, but I still believe in Longoria being a near-elite player on a friendly contract, so I was willing to deal several players who are quite good for him. I’m lower on Castillo and Johnson than most, but I really, really value Devers – I think he could eventually be a star.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">That having been said, this is a Dombrowski move. Get someone from a Florida team, who can help you win now. Plus, Longoria is a right-handed bat, meaning that the Sox are now really well-balanced with the additions of both Davis and Longo. It’s a steep price to pay, but the team is very close to having the best lineup in the AL. Eat it, Toronto.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">We still have some money left over, right? And with Castillo gone, we definitely need a new outfielder, again. Ben Zobrist could work as a play, but he priced himself very high, going to San Diego for five years and over $20 million per season. Can’t quite compete with that.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Hm. Toronto.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Ben Revere from Toronto for Matt Barnes</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Barnes still has life in his arm, but Revere is quietly a pretty decent offensive option in left. He’s like a poor-man’s Brett Gardner, now that Gardner’s defense has slipped to normal-human levels. He’s left-handed, which gives the team options. I don’t love him, but I like him. But … the Yankees just boosted their payroll to nearly $300 million by signing Justin Upton and Zack Greinke. I wonder if …</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox acquire Brett Gardner from New York for Ben Revere and Wendell Rijo</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Nice. That was unexpected. This means I converted Matt Barnes and Wendell Rijo into Brett Gardner, which I’m pretty sure was the biggest leap out of reality for this team in the entire simulation. I mean … seriously?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">But that finalizes my starting lineup, and I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that it is top-3 in baseball, with a fair chance at No. 1.</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Mookie Betts, CF</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Chris Davis, RF</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Evan Longoria, 3B</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">David Ortiz, DH</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Hanley Ramirez, 1B</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Dustin Pedroia, 2B</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Brett Gardner, LF</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Xander Bogaerts, SS</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">     </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Blake Swihart, C</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Time to fill out the roster with our depth choices and backups.</span></p>
<p><b>Red Sox sign Shane Victorino to a one-year, $2 million contract</b></p>
<p><b>Red Sox sign Ruben Tejada to a two-year, $4 million contract</b></p>
<p><b>Red Sox sign Jeff Francoeur and Rene Rivera to minor-league contracts</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">That should do it. Since Brock Holt is going to be the first backup for, in essence, every position but first base (love you, Travis Shaw), we had to include another infielder, and at least one outfielder. Tejada still has some upside, and can certainly handle short. Shane is as much a nostalgia piece as anything, but I know he can survive in Boston’s outfield. Could’ve used a right-handed hitter on the bench, though. That’s Francoeur’s role, even though he’s not very good. Rivera is catching depth, in case Hanigan or Swihart gets nicked up, plus he can teach framing.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">So that’s it. My tentative start-the-season 25-man roster is:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Catcher: Blake Swihart, Ryan Hanigan</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Infield: Hanley Ramirez, Dustin Pedroia, Xander Bogaerts, Evan Longoria, Brock Holt, Ruben Tejada</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Outfield: Chris Davis, Mookie Betts, Brett Gardner, Shane Victorino</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Designated Hitter: David Ortiz</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Starting Pitchers: Jose Fernandez, Carlos Carrasco, Eduardo Rodriguez, Clay Buchholz, Rick Porcello, Wade Miley</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Relief Pitchers: Joakim Soria, Koji Uehara, Junichi Tazawa, Brian Matusz, Tommy Hunter, Shawn Armstrong, Danny Farquhar</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">… and that leaves Shaw as the first man up when there’s an injury in ST, with Jean Machi as the first pitcher into the bullpen.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Let’s review the plan.</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Trade for an ace</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Acquire an ace in free agency</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Fix the bullpen</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Upgrade in an outfield corner</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: 400">      </span><span style="font-weight: 400">Rid the team of Pablo Sandoval’s contract</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Mostly successful, I think. Trading for an ace, that definitely happened. Say what you want, but adding Davis (even if he’s awful defensively) and Gardner is a win over JBJ and Castillo. And Sandoval is long gone. The bullpen could still be a disaster – there’s no dominant arm like a Kimbrel or Chapman, but it looks to carry some upside and more stability over 2015.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The team certainly added impact, immediate talent, but they are also guys who should continue to be productive over the next three-to-five years. Since the free agent market next season looks so bad, striking now to acquire bigger names seemed like the right choice. And don’t forget … about 70% of top prospects don’t pan out, so even dealing ones as good as Moncada and Devers could end up a long-term win, as well as a short-term one.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: 400">So. What do you think? Does this do Dave proud, or did I blow it by dealing some of the team’s best prospects?</span></strong></p>
<p><em>USA Today Sports Images/Steve Mitchell</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/12/01/bp-boston-unfiltered-the-big-dombrowski/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding Recent Comparables for Travis Shaw</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/09/24/finding-recent-comparables-for-travis-shaw/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/09/24/finding-recent-comparables-for-travis-shaw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Collins]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Longoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Francoeur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Schwarber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Middlebrooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=2492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Travis Shaw is arguably the GOAT, but is his performance sustainable? ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="p1"><span class="s1">It’s been a fun month for the Red Sox, who have gone from miserable cellar-dwellars to a merely bad team. It’s a stark change from other recent bad Red Sox squads that limped to the finish line in both 2012 and 2014. It’s been an especially fun run because it’s come on the back on the young players. They aren’t being led by turnarounds from expensive veterans. Instead, it’s been Xander Bogaerts, Mookie Betts, Jackie Bradley, Blake Swihart, Eduardo Rodriguez and Henry Owens leading the charge, among others. It’s always more fun to see youth succeed than veterans. Someone who has been particularly fun to watch is Travis Shaw.</span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Shaw hasn’t gone on a better run than all other Red Sox players, as Jackie Bradley casually turned into Barry Bonds for a month. He’s also not the most talented guy on the team, as either Bogaerts or Betts likely takes claim to that title. However, Shaw has certainly come out of nowhere more than any of the other young players, and there’s something special about watching that kind of breakthrough performance.</span></p>
<p class="p1" style="text-align: center"><iframe src="http://m.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=481450783&amp;topic_id=6479266&amp;width=400&amp;height=224&amp;property=mlb" width="400" height="224" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p class="p1">While watching Shaw has been fun, however, it’s only natural to eventually start thinking about how sustainable this kind of performance is from a rookie. As such, I thought it might be useful to compare Shaw’s first MLB season to other rookies of recent past, and see if it can tell us anything about Shaw’s future. I looked through Baseball-Reference’s play-index to find similar rookie seasons from the past 15 years, and the following names were the most interesting.</p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><b>Will Middlebrooks</b></span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Maybe it’s the eternal pessimist in me, but the first name that came to mind when I first really started thinking about Shaw’s season was Will Middlebrooks. They are both Red Sox corner infield prospects, and they look kind of similar [editor&#8217;s note: Will is infinitely more handsome] so I suppose it’s a natural comparison.</span></p>
<table style="height: 174px" width="479" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Player</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>PAs</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>AVG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>OBP</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>SLG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>TAv</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>K%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>BB%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>ISO</b></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Shaw</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">195</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.282</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.349</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.523</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.293</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">20.1</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">9.0</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.241</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Middlebrooks</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">286</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.288</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.325</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.509</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.279</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">24.5</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">4.5</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.279</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"> On the surface, these players have had similar debuts, but the more you look at it, the bigger advantage Shaw has. Although he has slightly less power than Middlebrooks, he has a much better approach at the plate, suggesting his performance may be a little more sustainable. That doesn’t necessarily mean Shaw’s career won’t follow Middlebrooks’ trajectory, but there’s certainly more to build from now than there was then, albeit in a slightly smaller sample size.</span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><b>Jeff Francoeur</b></span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Alright, maybe I do have a pessimism problem. Francoeur is another guy who jumped out to an amazing start, only to later flame out. Sure, he still has a job in the majors, but he’s fallen a long way since being a rookie phenom on the cover of Sports Illustrated.</span></p>
<table style="height: 174px" width="416" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Player</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>PAs</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>AVG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>OBP</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>SLG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>TAv</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>K%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>BB%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>ISO</b></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Shaw</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">195</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.282</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.349</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.523</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.293</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">20.1</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">9.0</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.241</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Francoeur</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.274</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.300</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.336</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.549</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.295</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">21.2</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">4.0</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.249</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"> These lines are quite similar, with Shaw showing better plate discipline (something that Francoeur has never exactly been known for) while Francoeur showed a more refined hit tool. The good news is the lack of walks is what likely undid the latter. The bad news is that his power also dissipated in a major way as his career worn on. Shaw’s overall line is great, but he’ll need that power to stick around if he’s going to be an everyday player in this league.</span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><b>Evan Longoria</b></span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Now we can safely put aside my pessimistic tendencies, as we have a bonafide superstar on the list of Shaw’s comparables. Both players are corner infielders, which is probably the only two things these players have in common. Shaw took a long time to push through the minors and had relatively little hype. Longoria made the majors shortly after he was drafted and was a highly-touted prospect at the time.</span></p>
<table style="height: 174px" width="391" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Player</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>PAs</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>AVG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>OBP</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>SLG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>TAv</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>K%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>BB%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>ISO</b></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Shaw</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">195</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.282</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.349</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.523</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.293</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">20.1</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">9.0</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.241</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Longoria</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">508</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.272</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.343</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.531</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.292</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">24.0</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">9.1</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.259</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"> Despite the many differences in these players’ backgrounds, they had very similar experiences in their first taste of the major-league level. In fact, these players have been almost identical, with Longoria showing a bit more power but sacrificing some strikeouts in the process. Of course, it has to be mentioned that Longoria’s performance came over the course of a full-season while Shaw’s has come in just a couple months of work. It’s not a perfect side-by-side, but just going by the numbers, these are very similar first-season experiences.</span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><b>Kyle Schwarber</b></span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">This was, to me, the most interesting name on the play-index results. Schwarber was a top-ten pick just a year ago, turned into one of the premier hitting prospects in the game and has already carved himself a role at the major-league level. Simply put, coming into the season, Schwarber was on people’s radars and Shaw was not. How do their 2015 rookie campaigns compare?</span></p>
<table style="height: 174px" width="422" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Player</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>PAs</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>AVG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>OBP</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>SLG</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>TAv</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>K%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>BB%</b></span></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>ISO</b></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Shaw</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">195</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.282</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.349</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.523</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.293</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">20.1</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">9.0</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.241</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"><b>Schwarber</b></span></td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">237</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.241</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.346</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.512</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.310</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">28.6</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">13.3</span></p>
</td>
<td valign="top">
<p align="right"><span style="color: #000000;font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">0.271</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"> Schwarber has certainly been the better rookie this season, but given their respective backgrounds, it’s surprisingly close. On top of that, Schwarber carries the higher strikeout rate, and that’s the one stat that has seemingly led to downfalls from top prospects. That’s not to say Schwarber won’t have the better career than Shaw — the opposite is almost certainly true — but the fact that you can make a case for Shaw’s long-term abilities is noteworthy on its own.</span></p>
<p class="p2" style="text-align: center"><span class="s1">***</span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">So, we have a bunch of comparisons, but is there anything that can really be learned from them? If anything, Shaw’s long-term outlook seems much better after comparing him to other recent rookies. The two players he has most in common with are Evan Longoria and Kyle Schwarber. One is a current superstar and possible future Hall of Famer and the other one is a player many have pegged as a future star. While he does have some in common with Middlebrooks and Francoeur, he boasts much better plate discipline than both of them, which was the biggest contributor to their respective downfalls. </span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">None of this means that Shaw is owed a full-time role in 2016, but it does give much more optimism about what his future holds. For a player who seemingly came out of nowhere to hit the cover off the ball, that’s a big first step.</span></p>
<p class="p1"><em>Photo by Andy Marlin/USA Today Sports Images</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2015/09/24/finding-recent-comparables-for-travis-shaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
