<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boston &#187; Travis Lakins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/tag/travis-lakins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com</link>
	<description>Bringing BP-quality analysis to Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Red Sox Should Still Trade for Julio Teheran</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/07/18/the-red-sox-should-still-trade-for-julio-teheran/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/07/18/the-red-sox-should-still-trade-for-julio-teheran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Carsley]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Pomeranz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eduardo Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Owens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julio Teheran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mauricio Dubon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Still need pitching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis Lakins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoan Moncada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=5655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, young pitching is hard to come by.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The Red Sox, as you may have heard, </span><a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=29828"><span style="font-weight: 400">traded for Drew Pomeranz last week</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400">. They had to give up Anderson Espinoza to do so, which stinks, but good lord is Pomeranz better than any of the myriad no. 4/5 starters the Sox were trotting out as sacrifices twice a week. We’ve seen Sean O’Sullivan and Roenis Elias make starts this year. Ditto Joe Kelly and Permanently Bad Clay Buchholz. Pomeranz’s acquisition should put an end to that, even if we’re not sure if he’ll slide in more as a no. 2 or no. 4 starter in the AL.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Given the cost of acquiring Pomeranz and how good this team is offensively, it’s tempting to believe this means the Red Sox should be done. They now have a reasonable top-four in their rotation, and might even go five deep if the Eduardo Rodriguez we saw in New York is the E-Rod we’ll get moving forward. Their offense is crazy good. Their bullpen is good enough, and could be a genuine plus if a few guys can stay healthy at once. The Red Sox’s current playoff odds stand at 79.9%, and we have every reason to believe this is a team that can make it to October, and might be able to play deep into that month.</span></p>
<p>I still think they should trade for Julio Teheran.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Teheran will cost a lot to acquire. He’s going to cost way more than just one of the remaining Big Three prospects, and he should. Teheran is 25 years old, is signed affordably through 2019 with an option for 2020 and, per PWARP, has had the 12th-best season of any starter this year (one spot ahead of Pomeranz, interestingly enough). He may not be an ace in the Chris Sale or Jose Fernandez sense, but he’s a really good, really young pitcher, and he’s probably available.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Despite the cost it will probably take to get him, there are a bunch of reasons Teheran is pretty much the perfect fit for this team right now. While the Red Sox shouldn’t completely mortgage their future to acquire him, he’d go a long way toward addressing the organization’s biggest deficiency. Before you yell at me, let’s review: </span></p>
<p><strong><strong> </strong></strong></p>
<h3><b>Teheran is good</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I alluded to this above, but Teheran, by any objective measure, is really good. He’s sporting a 2.96 ERA, 3.03 DRA, 22.8 K%, 5.3 BB% and 40.2 GB% in 118.2 innings this season. He’s a former top prospect who was also pretty good in 2013 and really good in 2014. He was meh last year, which seems to be the primary reason people are worried about acquiring him. But he has the pedigree, past performance and age of a pitcher who should be capable of throwing near the top of a rotation for many years. Those guys are hard to come by.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="http://m.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=857674583&amp;topic_id=6479266&amp;width=400&amp;height=224&amp;property=mlb" width="400" height="224" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The one legit gripe I see with Teheran is that he’s a fly-ball pitcher who’s already surrendering 1.21 HR/9 in Atlanta. That’s almost certainly going to go up in Fenway. My counter to this: show me all the good, young available pitchers on the market right now. They don’t exist. Just because Teheran isn’t perfect doesn’t mean he wouldn’t be a marked improvement over most arms in the Red Sox system. Maybe he’s more of a no. 3 in the AL than a no. 2, but Teheran isn’t going to go from an All-Star in Atlanta to a scrub in Boston. </span></p>
<p><strong><strong> </strong></strong></p>
<h3><b>Teheran is cheap and cost-controlled</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Back when the Braves were good, they locked up a significant portion of their core to team-friendly contract extensions. That didn’t stop them from shipping away Craig Kimbrel or Andrelton Simmons, and it shouldn’t stop them from trading Teheran, who signed a six-year, $32.4 million extension with the Braves before the 2014 season. He’s also got an affordable option for 2020, meaning the Red Sox could acquire Teheran’s age-25-through-age-30 seasons, which is pretty much exactly when you want to have a pitcher in your service. Teheran has also proven capable of staying on the mound and eating innings, averaging 202.1 IP over the past three years.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The best part about the Pomeranz deal, </span><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/07/15/from-bp-drew-pomeranz-transaction-analysis/"><span style="font-weight: 400">as I wrote in my TA at the mothersite</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400">, is that he’s under control for two more seasons beyond this one. That’s really important, because the Red Sox are looking at a solid three-to-four year window in which they should be competing for championships. Xander Bogaerts, Mookie Betts and Jackie Bradley Jr. won’t be expensive yet during this window. David Price, Rick Porcello, Pomeranz, Kimbrel and Carson Smith should all be reasonable contributors during this time. Yoan Moncada and Andrew Benintendi are poised to join that core by around this time next season. Plus, the Red Sox have solid complimentary players in Steven Wright, Blake Swihart, Hanley Ramirez, Brock Holt, Travis Shaw and Dustin Pedroia under control, too.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The Red Sox have offense, they have a few good starters and they have back-end bullpen arms. But in adding Teheran, they could build out a good, young rotation that will perfectly compliment their impressive offensive core for the next handful of seasons. That’s important for two reasons, the first of which is:</span></p>
<p><strong><strong> </strong></strong></p>
<h3><b>The Red Sox stink at developing starting pitching</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I covered this in depth in my TA, but to rehash: the Red Sox can’t develop starters! Matt Barnes has turned into a solid reliever, but he can’t start. Brandon Workman flopped in the rotation. Henry Owens’s control has taken a step back when it already needed to take two steps forward. Brian Johnson’s had trouble staying on the mound. Allen Webster flopped. Rubby De La Rosa stunk. Felix Doubront was only good for half a season. Michael Bowden busted. Trey Ball is headed in that direction. The Red Sox are good at a lot of things as an organization, but bringing along home-grown starters isn’t one of them.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">There’s still time for Owens and Johnson. Maybe one of them figures it out and becomes a back-end arm. There’s value in that, but Teheran figures to bring a whole lot more to the table; better performance and more certainty. When you can’t develop pitching, you need to either trade for it or sign it. Which brings us to the next point &#8230;</span></p>
<p><strong><strong> </strong></strong></p>
<h3><b>There are almost no good starters on the market</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The 2017 class of free-agent starters is a god damn tire fire. You’re looking at guys like Brett Anderson, Rich Hill, C.J. Wilson, Ivan Nova, Jeremy Hellickson and Doug Fister at the </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">top</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400"> of the class. There’s no one even close to Teheran available.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">In terms of targeting a different arm than Teheran to trade for, ok. That’s reasonable. But who’s out there? Sale and Fernandez shouldn’t be available. The A’s have no reason to sell low on Sonny Gray, nor the Rays on Chris Archer (who might not even be as good as Teheran). Zack Greinke’s contract would be pretty tough to swallow if the D-Backs would even be willing to move him. The Indians are in the thick of things and have no reason to sell Corey Kluber, Danny Salazar or Carlos Carrasco.  It’s not a buyer’s market. </span></p>
<p><strong><strong> </strong></strong></p>
<h3><b>The Red Sox have the prospect depth</b></h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The final point is the most painful one, because I, like the rest of you, like to hug my prospects close and tuck them in at night. But the point of amassing prospects isn’t to ensure that all of them reach the big-league club; it’s to use them in any way that can contribute to the on-field product. Often times that means making room for them on the MLB roster, but it can also mean trading them to acquire talent that fits better.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Dave Dombrowski clearly knows this, having traded away three top-100 prospects in Espinoza, Manuel Margot and Javier Guerra for Pomeranz and Kimbrel. Losing that type of talent hurts, but the crazy thing about Boston’s farm system is they still have the pieces needed to get Teheran, or at the very last to try.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Here’s where it gets tricky; I’m 100% sure I would not move Moncada for Teheran, and I’m 90% sure I wouldn’t move Benintendi for him either. If the Braves insist on one of those two to start the package &#8212; a demand they’d be well within their right to make &#8212; I have no problem with the Red Sox holding serve and looking for a cheaper upgrade or praying E-Rod turns it around.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">But I don’t think it’s crazy to think the Red Sox could start a package with Rafael Devers and Eduardo Rodriguez and build from there. Consider the Shelby Miller trade from earlier this season. The Braves received a top-25 prospect in Dansby Swanson, a reasonable everyday player in Ender Inciarte and a top-100 arm in Aaron Blair for Miller, who pitched much better than Teheran did last year but who doesn’t come with Teheran’s insanely team-friendly contract. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Odds are the Braves would be looking for something similar for Teheran, and I think the Red Sox can match. Devers would be Swanson in this case, a mid-minors top-25 bat with impact potential. E-Rod could take the place of Inciarte as a young, MLB-ready piece right now. And Henry Owens could serve here as Aaron Blair, giving the Braves another young arm to try and groom (seriously, they love young arms).</span></p>
<p>Maybe the Red Sox also throw in a Mauricio Dubon (sorry Collins) or a Pat Light or a Travis Lakins. If that’s what it takes to get Teheran while holding onto Moncada and Benintendi, so be it.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Red Sox have the opportunity to make a very competitive offer for Teheran without gutting the core pieces that should contribute to their future.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The Braves could decide such a package isn’t enough. Maybe another pitching-needy team like the Blue Jays or Rangers or Dodgers will come knocking and blow the Braves away with a bevvy of young talent. Maybe Atlanta will decide they want to hold on to Teheran as they rebuild, even though they’re probably at least two years away from contention. If this is the case, so be it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">But the Red Sox have the opportunity to make a very competitive offer without gutting the core pieces that should contribute to their future. At the very least, it’s an opportunity they should explore. A rotation of Price, Teheran, Wright, Pomeranz and Porcello wouldn’t just be respectable; it would be objectively good. And it could be good for the next several seasons while leaving the Red Sox with enough money to go get another arm should a starter go down with injury or underperform.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Pairing that type of a rotation with the Red Sox’s young, offensive core will give them the type of young, cost-controlled, high-upside team every fan dreams of rooting for. And while Boston’s minor league depth will suffer as a result, they’d </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">still </span></i><span style="font-weight: 400">have the pieces to make marginal upgrades thanks to players like Sam Travis, Michael Kopech, Jason Groome and others. The point of a good farm system isn’t to win offseason org rankings; it’s to help the big-league squad win.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Teheran is not a “true ace,” is not the best fit for Fenway Park and would cost a fortune in talent. He’s also good, young, has upside remaining and can provide the Red Sox the one thing they need and can’t develop on their own; quality starting pitching. It would be a risky move for Boston, but nothing ventured, nothing gained. </span></p>
<p>When you have a young core this good, it’s time to venture.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Jason Getz/USA Today Sports Images</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/07/18/the-red-sox-should-still-trade-for-julio-teheran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fenway&#8217;s Future: Marco Hernandez, Travis Lakins and Anderson Espinoza</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/11/fenways-future-marco-hernandez-travis-lakins-and-anderson-espinoza/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/11/fenways-future-marco-hernandez-travis-lakins-and-anderson-espinoza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 11:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Teeter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fenway's Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anderson Espinoza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Swihart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chandler Shepherd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Hernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pawtucket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis Lakins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ty Buttrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoan Moncada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=4457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know the drill. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="western"><i>In this week&#8217;s Fenway&#8217;s Future we look at a middle infielder at Triple-A who could help the big league bench, and a selection of pitchers throughout the lower levels who have shown considerable promise in the early stages of the season. We also check-in with a few familiar names </i><i>and </i><i>the author makes a selfish promotion-plea aimed at augmenting his viewing experience this week.</i></p>
<p class="western"><b>Triple-A Pawtucket: </b><i>Marco Hernandez (SS/2B)</i></p>
<p class="western">Marco Hernandez was acquired in the Felix Doubront trade with the Cubs at the 2014 trade deadline. At the time he looked like a light-hitting middle infielder, having posted below average TAv marks at the Low- and High-A levels of the Cubs&#8217; system. Since joining the Red Sox organization he has developed into an offensive threat. He opened his Red Sox career at Double-A Portland in 2015 and hit well enough (.289 TAv) to earn a mid-season promotion to Triple-A Pawtucket. There, he slashed .271/.300/.409 (.266 TAv) which is a step down from what he was doing in Portland, but likely represents his adjustment to the higher level of pitching.</p>
<p class="western">He opened this season at Triple-A and has gotten back to his excellent offensive ways. In 81 plate appearances he has .330 TAv, the highest mark he has shown at any level. Of course, I need to note that this performance has come in a small number of trips to the plate and that Hernandez is carrying a .417 batting average of balls in play, but there are positive developments. For example, his plate discipline. Hernandez&#8217;s walk rate is higher this season than it was last year at the Triple-A level, and, even better, he has paired it with a lower strikeout rate. Having a solid command of the strike zone is something that will help him get to the next level and succeed once there.</p>
<p class="western">We saw Hernandez make his major league debut with the Red Sox earlier this season. On April 17, he started at second base, giving Dustin Pedroia a day off, and went 1-for-2 with a single, a walk and a stolen base, and was the Red Sox&#8217;s top offensive contributor by win probability added. We saw how he can impact a game at the plate and with his speed on the base paths. While I have focused on Hernandez&#8217;s offense, he is no slouch on defense. Taken together, Hernandez has the potential to be an asset in the major leagues as, at least, a bench, utility infielder role. Once the pitching rotation is settled and the bullpen is sorted out I would like to see the Red Sox get back to carrying (no more than) a 12-pitcher staff and consider adding Hernandez to the bench.</p>
<p class="western"><i>Quick updates on Rusney Castillo (OF) and Blake Swihart (C, OF)</i></p>
<p class="western">Since we last checked in with Rusney Castillo on April 25, he has made 41 trips to the plate, collecting just six hits (three doubles) and two walks. All told he has a .227/.289/.280 line (83 PA) on the season, which is just bad.</p>
<p class="western">Blake Swihart has made five starts in the outfield without any reported disaster and is still getting starts at catcher, so that route back to Boston is not yet closed. Regardless, his offense has stalled since returning to Pawtucket. He is not hitting for power (.042 isolated power) and not getting on-base at tolerable rate (.284). I hope the demotion did not break him.</p>
<p class="western"><b>Double-A Portland: </b><i>Ty Buttrey (RHP) and Chandler Shepherd (RHP)</i></p>
<p class="western">Last season, Buttrey was quickly promoted from Greenville to Salem after showing overpowering stuff in his four starts at the lower level. However, he did not show the same ability at the higher level. In 21 starts at the higher level his ERA was almost two runs higher, largely a result of getting fewer strikeouts and allowing more walks. Regardless, Buttrey was promoted to Double-A to start the 2016 season. Unfortunately, the trend in fewer strikeouts and more walks has followed him through his five starts, leading to a poor runs-allowed total. Control really seems to be his issue. In his 22.0 innings, he has walked as many batters (14) as he has struck out, and hit five of them. His last start was arguably his best of the season with regards to control, as he only walked one batter, struck out two and threw 60 percent of his pitches for strikes over his five innings of work. Ideally this is an outing he can build on.</p>
<p class="western">Buttrey&#8217;s teammate, Chandler Shepherd is a reliever who has not struggled with the same control issues that have plagued Buttrey to date. In 10 appearances out of the bullpen (16.1 innings), Shepherd has held opponents scoreless seven times, striking out 20 of the 64 batters he has faced, while only walking five. He had been cruising along, dominating opponents until his most recent outing, which was his worst on the young season. Over two innings he allowed three runs on two home runs and walked two batters. The tough day raised his 2016 RA9 from a respectable 2.51 to a not-so-great 3.86. Regardless, it was one poor outing and generally Shepherd has been a real bright spot for the Sea Dogs so far this season. He looks to be another relief option for the Red Sox in the not-too-distant future.</p>
<p class="western"><b>High-A Salem: </b><i>Travis Lakins (RHP)</i></p>
<p class="western">Lakins was selected by the Red Sox in the sixth round of last summer&#8217;s amateur draft. He pitched for Ohio State for two seasons before entering the draft. There are questions about whether Lakins can stay in a starting role as he progresses through the system, but so far he is pitching well enough to remain a starter. If you drop his first start – which was pretty rough (3.2 innings, five hits, four runs, three walks, three strikeouts) – from consideration, Lakins has made five strong starts, posting a 2.93 RA9 (3.09 FIP), a 30-to-8 strikeout-to-walk ratio, and has only allowed one home run. That is an impressive line for the 21-year-old. Continuing to perform as he has should keep him in a starting role for the foreseeable future and could even lead to a promotion to the next level this season where he will be challenged by better hitters.</p>
<p class="western"><i>Updates on the Big-Three:</i></p>
<p class="western">Andrew Benintendi continues to dominate High-A pitching to a ridiculous extent. He went hitless on Saturday for just the third time this season, which snapped his 23-game hit streak; a Salem Red Sox franchise record. His season line sits at .368/.424/.624. It is not clear to me what else he has to learn at this level. Power? He only has one home run, but has seven triples and 13 doubles and a .256 ISO. Plate discipline? I suppose he could walk more often than he has, but he has more walks (11) than strikeouts (8) and does not appear to be having difficulty making solid contact. I think it is time to promote him to Double-A. Full disclosure: my advocating for his promotion is partly selfish, as I will be in Portland on Thursday to watch the Sea Dogs and want to see Benintendi play. Make me happy, Mr. Dombrowski.</p>
<p class="western">Much of what I wrote about Benintendi can be applied to Yoan Moncada. He too is ready for a promotion to the next level. Since we last checked in with him, Moncada&#8217;s season line has dipped slightly to .317/.450/.510, but those are still tremendous rates. I wouldn&#8217;t mind watching him on Thursday either, Mr. Dombrowski. Make the move.</p>
<p class="western">To go along with his Big-Three teammates, Rafael Devers seems to be coming out of his early season struggles. Over his most recent 49 plate appearances he has a .250/.327/.477 line, with two home runs, two doubles, a triple, five walks to seven strikeouts, and two stolen bases without getting caught. Things are moving in the expected direction.</p>
<p class="western"><b>Low-A Greenville:</b><i> Anderson Espinoza (RHP)</i></p>
<p class="western">Espinoza is the Red Sox&#8217;s top pitching prospect. At just 18-years old, he is really young for the Low-A level, but his youth has not really affected his performance. Of his six starts, four have been strong (18.1 innings, three runs allowed, 26 strikeouts, six walks) and two have been clunkers (8.2 innings, ten runs allowed, nine strikeouts, three walks). All told, he has 35 strikeouts in 27.0 innings, which is absolutely fantastic. If he can pair his swing-and-miss stuff with an ability to consistently generate weak contact he will be a true force on the mound. How the Red Sox handle Espinoza&#8217;s development through the minor leagues will be interesting to see. Given that he is still young for the Low-A level, it makes sense that he will stay with Greenville for the duration of the 2016 season, continuing to work on his efficiency and developing his arm strength. However, if it gets to the point where he is not challenged by Low-A hitters then moving him to Salem is probably the better course of action. Either way, avoiding rushing him and potentially risking injury is paramount, as he has a high ceiling.</p>
<p class="western"><em>Photo by Bob DeChiara/USA Today Sports Images</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2016/05/11/fenways-future-marco-hernandez-travis-lakins-and-anderson-espinoza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
