<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boston &#187; Pablo Sandoval</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/tag/pablo-sandoval/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com</link>
	<description>Bringing BP-quality analysis to Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The 2017 Roster Recap Compendium</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/13/the-2017-roster-recap-compendium/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/13/the-2017-roster-recap-compendium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Cowett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addison Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Maddox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blaine Boyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Swihart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Workman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Holt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carson Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase d'Arnaud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Vazquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Kimbrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deven Marrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Fister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Pomeranz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Pedroia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eduardo Nunez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eduardo Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernando Abad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanley Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heath Hembree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hector Velazquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackie Bradley Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Rutledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Kendrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Hernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Barnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Moreland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noe Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajai Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Porcello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robbie Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robby Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roenis Elias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Travis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Leon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Selsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tzu-Wei Lin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=36099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get caught up on what your favorite players did last year.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the offseason, we here at BP Boston run a series called Roster Recaps, in which we detail the year that was for every player that graced the major league roster in 2017. Some you might vividly remember (Chris Sale!), while others you&#8217;ll struggle to recall what they did (Ben Taylor&#8230; ?). For the players in the latter category, we&#8217;ve got you covered. If you feel like looking back on some good times, we&#8217;ll accommodate you too.</p>
<p>Presenting the full list 2017 Roster Recaps, listed with the authors that wrote them. An asterisk denotes a player who has, as of March 13th, dearly departed the Red Sox. We&#8217;ll miss them all terribly.</p>
<p><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRvazquez.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-36127" src="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRvazquez.jpg" alt="RRvazquez" width="800" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>Catchers</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: The End of Sandy Leon’s Tale?" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/13/roster-recap-the-end-of-sandy-leons-tale/" target="_blank">Sandy Leon</a> (Cam Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Blake Swihart, Post-Hype" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/11/roster-recap-blake-swihart-post-hype/" target="_blank">Blake Swihart</a> (Jake Devereaux)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Your Starting Catcher, Christian Vazquez" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/22/roster-recap-your-starting-catcher-christian-vazquez/" target="_blank">Christian Vazquez</a> (Brett Cowett)</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRdevers.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-36128" src="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRdevers.jpg" alt="RRdevers" width="800" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>Infielders</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Xander Bogaerts Has Another Rough Second Half" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/16/roster-recap-xander-bogaerts-has-another-rough-second-half/" target="_blank">Xander Bogaerts</a> (Chris Teeter)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: A Guy Named Chase d’Arnaud" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/05/roster-recap-a-guy-named-chase-darnaud/" target="_blank">Chase d&#8217;Arnaud</a>* (Matt Kory)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Rafael Devers’ Bright Future" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/10/roster-recap-rafael-devers-bright-future/" target="_blank">Rafael Devers</a> (Kory)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: A Short Season For Marco Hernandez" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/12/roster-recap-a-short-season-for-marco-hernandez/" target="_blank">Marco Hernandez</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Vertigo Halts Brock Holt" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/27/roster-recap-vertigo-halts-brock-holt/" target="_blank">Brock Holt</a> (Devereaux)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: A Major Breakout for Tzu-Wei Lin" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/29/roster-recap-a-major-breakout-for-tzu-wei-lin/" target="_blank">Tzu-Wei Lin</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=36113" target="_blank">Deven Marrero</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Mitch Moreland’s Meddling Toe" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/21/roster-recap-mitch-morelands-meddling-toe/" target="_blank">Mitch Moreland</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: The “Underwhelming” Eduardo Nunez" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/09/roster-recap-the-underwhelming-eduardo-nunez/" target="_blank">Eduardo Nunez</a> (Teeter)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Time is Wearing Down Dustin Pedroia" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/22/roster-recap-time-is-wearing-down-dustin-pedroia/" target="_blank">Dustin Pedroia</a> (Kory)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Hanley Hits Another Low" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/28/roster-recap-hanley-hits-another-low/" target="_blank">Hanley Ramirez</a> (Devereaux)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Josh Rutledge Gets Gone" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/18/roster-recap-josh-rutledge-gets-gone/" target="_blank">Josh Rutledge</a>* (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: The Pablo Sandoval Era Mercifully Ends" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/19/roster-recap-the-pablo-sandoval-era-mercifully-ends/" target="_blank">Pablo Sandoval</a>* (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Sam Travis’ Future Remains Unclear" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/14/roster-recap-sam-travis-future-remains-unclear/" target="_blank">Sam Travis</a> (Teeter)</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRbenny.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-36130" src="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRbenny.jpg" alt="RRbenny" width="800" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>Outfielders</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: A Good Start For Andrew Benintendi" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/16/roster-recap-a-good-start-for-andrew-benintendi/" target="_blank">Andrew Benintendi</a> (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: This Time, Mookie Betts Is Merely Great" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/17/roster-recap-this-time-mookie-betts-is-merely-great/" target="_blank">Mookie Betts</a> (Kory)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Jackie Bradley’s Missing Bat" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/14/roster-recap-jackie-bradleys-missing-bat/" target="_blank">Jackie Bradley Jr.</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Rajai Davis Was Here" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/16/roster-recap-rajai-davis-was-here/" target="_blank">Rajai Davis</a>* (Daniel Poarch)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Steve Selsky Was Here" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/28/roster-recap-steve-selsky-was-here/" target="_blank">Steve Selsky</a> (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: The Baffling Usage of Chris Young" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/03/roster-recap-the-baffling-usage-of-chris-young/" target="_blank">Chris Young</a>* (Cowett)</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRkimbrel.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-36131" src="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/RRkimbrel.jpg" alt="RRkimbrel" width="800" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>Pitchers</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Low Leverage For Fernando Abad" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/01/roster-recap-low-leverage-for-fernando-abad/" target="_blank">Fernando Abad</a>* (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Pressure Doesn’t Suit Matt Barnes" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/09/roster-recap-pressure-doesnt-suit-matt-barnes/" target="_blank">Matt Barnes</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Barreling Up Blaine Boyer" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/24/roster-recap-barreling-up-blaine-boyer/" target="_blank">Blaine Boyer</a>* (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Roenis Elias Faces Two Batters" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/01/roster-recap-roenis-elias-faces-two-batters/" target="_blank">Roenis Elias</a> (Poarch)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Doug Fister is Unremarkably Usable" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/08/roster-recap-doug-fister-is-unremarkably-usable/" target="_blank">Doug Fister</a>* (Kory)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Heath Hembree Looks Good, Really Isn’t" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/23/roster-recap-heath-hembree-looks-good-really-isnt/" target="_blank">Heath Hembree</a> (Kory)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: The Wait Continues for Brian Johnson" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/21/roster-recap-the-wait-continues-for-brian-johnson/" target="_blank">Brian Johnson</a> (Teeter)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Joe Kelly is Incredibly Average" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/29/roster-recap-joe-kelly-is-incredibly-average/" target="_blank">Joe Kelly</a> (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Schrödinger’s Kendrick" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/06/schrodingers-kendrick/" target="_blank">Kyle Kendrick</a>* (Poarch)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Craig Kimbrel Strikes Back" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/05/roster-recap-craig-kimbrel-strikes-back/" target="_blank">Craig Kimbrel</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Is Austin Maddox Any Good?" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/17/roster-recap-is-austin-maddox-any-good/" target="_blank">Austin Maddox</a> (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Kyle Martin Brings Us To The End" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/08/roster-recap-kyle-martin-brings-us-to-the-end/" target="_blank">Kyle Martin</a> (Poarch)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: What Do We Make of Drew Pomeranz?" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/04/roster-recap-what-do-we-make-of-drew-pomeranz/" target="_blank">Drew Pomeranz</a> (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Rick Porcello’s Long Slide" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/30/roster-recap-rick-porcellos-long-slide/" target="_blank">Rick Porcello</a> (Teeter)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: David Price is Still Divisive" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/08/roster-recap-david-price-is-still-divisive/" target="_blank">David Price</a> (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Noe Ramirez is Another Reliever" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/21/roster-recap-noe-ramirez-is-another-reliever/" target="_blank">Noe Ramirez</a>* (Poarch)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Addison Reed’s Forgettable Stay" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/10/roster-recap-addison-reeds-forgettable-stay/" target="_blank">Addison Reed</a>* (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: A Disjointed Season For E-Rod" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/28/roster-recap-a-disjointed-season-for-e-rod/" target="_blank">Eduardo Rodriguez</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Robbie Ross’ Handful of Innings" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/13/roster-recap-robbie-ross-handful-of-innings/" target="_blank">Robbie Ross</a>* (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Chris Sale Makes History" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/07/roster-recap-chris-sale-makes-history/" target="_blank">Chris Sale</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Robby Scott’s Homer Problem" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/30/roster-recap-robby-scotts-homer-problem/" target="_blank">Robby Scott</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Carson Smith Returns To The Mound" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/07/roster-recap-carson-smith-returns-to-the-mound/" target="_blank">Carson Smith</a> (Teeter)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: For Ben Taylor, The Bus Awaits" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/08/roster-recap-for-ben-taylor-the-bus-awaits/" target="_blank">Ben Taylor</a> (Cowett)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Hector Velazquez Adds Some Depth" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/22/roster-recap-hector-velazquez-adds-some-depth/" target="_blank">Hector Velazquez</a> (Devereaux)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: Brandon Got Back to Work, Man" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/07/roster-recap-brandon-got-back-to-work-man/" target="_blank">Brandon Workman</a> (Ellis)</li>
<li><a title="Roster Recap: An Early Exit For Steven Wright" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/12/roster-recap-an-early-exit-for-steven-wright/" target="_blank">Steven Wright</a> (Kory)</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Header photo by Winslow Townson &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/13/the-2017-roster-recap-compendium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roster Recap: Love For Deven Marrero&#8217;s Glove</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/12/roster-recap-love-for-deven-marreros-glove/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/12/roster-recap-love-for-deven-marreros-glove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Cowett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deven Marrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Rutledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Hernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tzu-Wei Lin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=36113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone get this man a bat. Please.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I thought we were done. 48 players, recapped and published, and I could put my mind at ease. Every one of them was done, and I wouldn&#8217;t have to hassle writers to churn out hundreds of words for a player that scarcely needs a word count in the triple digits to describe. Hell, some <a title="Roster Recap: Roenis Elias Faces Two Batters" href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/02/01/roster-recap-roenis-elias-faces-two-batters/">barely played at all</a>.</p>
<p>The sun was shining, the birds were singing, and &#8212; <em>oh god</em>, we haven&#8217;t done Deven Marrero yet. The 49th man. And now the clouds are coming back and the birds have gone silent. <em>Just one more</em>, I thought to myself. <em>Just one more</em>.</p>
<p>Deven Marrero with a glove is silk. He&#8217;s one of those players that will make even the toughest of plays seem routine, like he had been preparing his whole life for that one hard-hit grounder to go that far to his right. There&#8217;s a subtle pleasure in watching a great fielder do great fielding things, and if that&#8217;s your drug, Marrero is your fix. Inject it into our veins.</p>
<p>Deven Marrero with a bat? Well, if you can imagine what a <a href="https://media3.giphy.com/media/3oxHQJp7khCjXu7vPy/giphy.gif" target="_blank">disgusted recoil</a> sounds like, that&#8217;s pretty much all you need to know.</p>
<h4>What Went Right</h4>
<p>The Red Sox, in their pre-Devers days, had a bit of crisis with finding a third baseman that could actually produce any kind of value. Pablo Sandoval, Josh Rutledge, and Marco Hernandez all tried their best, but due to injuries, ineffectiveness, or a combination of the two, none of them could produce. That&#8217;s where Marrero comes in. If their third baseman wasn&#8217;t going to get hits, it might as well take them away, and oh boy can Marrero do that.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.mlb.com/video/share/marreros-great-barehanded-play/c-1842555383?tid=6479266" width="540" height="304" scrolling="no" ></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Marrero&#8217;s defensive prowess got him 364 innings at third base, along with 106.2 innings at other positions in the infield. That includes 2.2 innings at first base, which he can now field, apparently. It&#8217;s only a matter of time until the Red Sox will only require a pitcher, a catcher, and Deven Marrero in the field.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">We know how horrifying his hitting is, but he did have one bright spot.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3ghWb5F5H1U" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left">That&#8217;s a two-homer game. Against Jose Quintana. Baseball is simply magical.</p>
<h4>What Went Wrong</h4>
<p>188 plate appearances might be good for Marrero on a personal level, but that was a canary in a coal mine for the Red Sox. If someone with Marrero&#8217;s offensive prowess was getting that much playing time in the majors, something &#8212; more specifically, third base &#8212; was very wrong. Marrero slashed .211/.259/.333 with a 32.4 percent strikeout rate, which looks as awful as it is. That comes out to a .215 TAv. He did hit four home runs, which technically counts as a power surge, if you&#8217;re looking for the thinnest silver lining possible.</p>
<p>Even his time at third base didn&#8217;t last very long, all things considered. Tzu-Wei Lin, who was called up directly from Double-A Portland, overtook him at the hot corner in late June.</p>
<p>Good thing the Red Sox have Rafael Devers.</p>
<h4>What To Expect</h4>
<p>Marrero is going to be involved in the second base carousel until Dustin Pedroia returns, so he&#8217;ll most likely stick with the team for a good while. After that, it&#8217;s anyone&#8217;s guess. His glove will keep him hovering around the majors, and maybe even start for a team desperate for anything at second base, shortstop, or third base. Right now, he looks to be part of the well-stocked depth the Red Sox have, and with no offense to be found, it isn&#8217;t likely that he&#8217;ll be much more than that. He&#8217;s good for a sparkling defensive play or two, but this is who he is.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Patrick McDermott &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/03/12/roster-recap-love-for-deven-marreros-glove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Winter&#8217;s Woes</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/26/next-winters-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/26/next-winters-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Kory]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Pollock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew McCutchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Dozier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryce Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Blackmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton Kershaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cody Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Kimbrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Pomeranz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Pedroia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elvis Andrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackie Bradley Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Donaldson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Machado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marwin Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Moreland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nelson Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedro Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Porcello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zach Britton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=33768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Red Sox are reaching a breaking point in how they acquire good players.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are different views on what the heck is going on with free agency this off-season. It’s complicated and antagonistic and likely speaks to greater labor problems down the road than we fans have prepared ourselves for. So we’re going to skip right over it all! This is an article about looking ahead, ahead to next off-season. See how we did that? Pretty good, right?</p>
<p>But this isn’t a simple case of passing the buck. The 2018-19 off-season promises perhaps the biggest free agent class ever. It’s such a promising offseason that I can remember hearing about it three or four years ago, which, when you think about it, is ridiculous. Still, there’s a reason for the extreme foresight. In case you’re unaware of the specifics of this class, here is a list of players who will hit the open market after this upcoming season.</p>
<ul>
<li>Josh Donaldson</li>
<li>Charlie Blackmon</li>
<li>Drew Pomeranz</li>
<li>Elvis Andrus</li>
<li>Brian Dozier</li>
<li>Andrew Miller</li>
<li>Craig Kimbrel</li>
<li>A.J. Pollock</li>
<li>Daniel Murphy</li>
<li>Marwin Gonzalez</li>
<li>Gio Gonzalez</li>
<li>Andrew McCutchen</li>
<li>Nelson Cruz</li>
<li>Zach Britton</li>
<li>Cody Allen</li>
<li>Adam Jones</li>
</ul>
<p>Pretty nuts, right? And here’s the part about it that is crazy, bizarro, extreme, Vince-McMahon-rebooting-the-XFL-level nuts: that’s not really the list. Sure, all those guys are going to be free agents after the 2018 season, but I didn’t include three guys of particular note. I’m talking about Bryce Harper, Manny Machado, and Clayton Kershaw. Those three guys are the reason people have been talking about this free agent class for half a decade.</p>
<p>Those are some huge names, some huge players. The thing is, in the case of the first two, both will be 26 years old in 2019 &#8212; the first year of their new contracts. Not since Alex Rodriguez signed with the Texas Rangers as a 25-year-old-to be in 2001 have we seen a player with this level of talent enter the market at such a young age. This free agent class has two of those guys. Oh, and also the best pitcher since Pedro Martinez in Kershaw. It’s truly a stacked class, and teams have been planning for it since fans became aware of it, or maybe even before that.</p>
<p>We’re 400 words into this thing and I haven’t yet brought up the Boston Red Sox which is odd since this is a Boston Red Sox website. Like every other team, the Red Sox are aware of this class of players. Like every other team, the Red Sox would love to have many of those players. The luxury tax is preventing that from happening. The total salary expenditure that teams must be below is $197 million. After that, penalties aplenty are levied, which increase each season teams that are over. The Red Sox kept below the luxury tax threshold last season, meaning if they go over this season the penalties aren’t too steep.</p>
<blockquote><p>Like every other team, the Red Sox would love to have many of those players. The luxury tax is preventing that from happening.</p></blockquote>
<p>With arbitration raises though last season’s payroll has gone up even though the roster is basically the same, putting the Red Sox over the threshold in 2018. Signing Bryce Harper or Clayton Kershaw would certainly put the Sox over again in 2019 and, considering they’d likely have to put a huge AAV towards doing so, it would contribute to putting them over again in 2020 as well. Should the Red Sox go far over they could lose their first round draft pick in addition to paying a ton of extra money as a tax for spending so much (seriously, players union, WTF?).</p>
<p>The effect of this on the Red Sox is to incentivize them to spend below the tax threshold. The Red Sox already have $92 million locked up in player salaries for the 2019 season, and that’s for just four guys in David Price, Dustin Pedroia, Rick Porcello, and Mitch Moreland. (They’re paying $18.45 million to a fifth in Pablo Sandoval but he’s no longer on the team.) Things get tighter if the Red Sox do shell out another $100+ million deal for J.D. Martinez or another free agent this offseason. That would likely put the Sox over the tax threshold for a second consecutive season, even without signing Harper or another big name from next off-season’s free agent class.</p>
<p>Now, the Red Sox could say, &#8220;Screw it, we’re going to put the best team on the field regardless of the luxury tax limit.&#8221; But that seems unlikely. The team has spent liberally over the years since John Henry bought them back in 2002, and there’s little reason to expect that not to continue, but asking the team to pay millions for the privilege of paying millions years into the future seems unlikely.</p>
<p>The problem as it stands now is that the team doesn’t have minor league talent that can step in for veterans on expiring contracts, meaning if everything else stays as is, free agents will have to replace free agents. For example, Rick Porcello’s deal is up after the 2019 season which sounds great. Hooray! The Red Sox will have $21 million to use. Except what do you think the going rate for a decent starting pitcher will be in two seasons? I’m guessing it’s going to be a lot, maybe something around $21 million a year. And the Red Sox will also have to replace (or re-sign) Chris Sale and they’ll have already replaced (or re-signed) Drew Pomeranz the season before, likely requiring more money. Boston’s dollars aren’t endless is the point, and guys on cheap deals can’t all be replaced at the top of the market.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gf3LC0s9zMU?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>One way out for the Red Sox is if David Price opts out of his contract after the 2018 season. If he does, the Red Sox are off the hook for the remaining four years, $127 million. That money could be spent directly on a Kershaw or, probably more likely, Sale.</p>
<p>While the Red Sox could make a run at Kershaw, and damn the luxury tax, the other two generational talents are less likely to sign in Boston. Both Harper and Machado play positions the Red Sox already have covered for the significant future. Machado plays third base where the Red Sox are hoping Rafael Devers will be for the next six seasons. Sure Boston could move him to first or deal him and try to add Machado, but doing that is a significant step towards the luxury tax threshold. Harper seems the more realistic of the two at least in terms of fit, as one of Jackie Bradley or Andrew Benintendi could be moved to make room. And that would be fine. Harper is that good. But the thing is the Red Sox don’t have to do that. They don’t have a hole at third or a hole in the outfield corners, which means they’d be both replacing a good player and doing so by adding one of the biggest contracts in baseball history. Considering their place against the cap (we’re just going to call it what it is, a soft salary cap), doing that seems unlikely.</p>
<p>You never rule it out though. This is the Red Sox. This is Dave Dombrowski. These are great, great players. You never rule it out. But right now, where the Red Sox are, with David Price’s deal on the books until it isn’t, and $18.5 million due to Pablo Sandoval this coming season and the one after it, the arbitration raises coming due, and the lot, it doesn’t seem like the right time for the Red Sox to make a huge addition. All of which means they may just sit out the greatest free agent market of all time.</p>
<p>Or, you know, not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/26/next-winters-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Red Sox, The Celtics, and the Future</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/25/the-red-sox-the-celtics-and-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/25/the-red-sox-the-celtics-and-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Poarch]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP Boston Unfiltered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Cherington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Kimbrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Pedroia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanley Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Groome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Millar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Youkilis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koji Uehara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Chavis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Moreland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafael Devers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=33694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's an innate need for stability that the Red Sox don't seem to have.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: Boston’s sports franchises are doing interesting things. The Patriots are back in the Super Bowl, the Celtics are in first place in the Eastern Conference, and the Bruins are second in the NHL in points. For Boston fans that have come to expect consistent success, this year has been no disappointment.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">For all those teams’ success, there’s a notable local organization lagging behind in terms of hype: the Red Sox. Few people seem to be talking about them right now. It’s been an unusually quiet offseason across the MLB, but perhaps the only Red Sox talking point of note right now is the extended stare-down with free agent J.D. Martinez. After that, it’s… Mitch Moreland’s two-year deal? Yikes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I’m not used to feeling so unenthused about the Red Sox. They were the team that brought me into Boston sports, after all. In a manner of speaking, I suppose I&#8217;m sort of a bandwagon fan, but it wasn&#8217;t one of the championship teams that brought me here. No, it was the 2009 team that did that &#8212; if you remember, that&#8217;s the one that got swept by the Angels in the ALDS.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/e45Pob6WbR8?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">It was a simple decision: “Maybe I&#8217;ll give baseball a shot.” I was in high school, and football wasn&#8217;t quite cutting it for me, so I felt it was time to branch out. The Red Sox and Angels were on, and it didn&#8217;t take long for me to get hooked. I loved Dustin Pedroia’s fiery demeanor, David Ortiz’s easy confidence, and most of all, Kevin Youkilis’ completely absurd batting stance. Jon Lester’s triumph over lymphoma was incredibly cool, and Josh Beckett looked liable to beat up an opposing hitter at a moment’s notice, which was also pretty cool in its own way.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">The season ended too soon after, but it was a busy offseason for me; I needed to learn more about these players, this franchise, this city. I knew about The Curse and the legendary 2004 team that finally ended it. I didn&#8217;t know about the comeback against the Yankees, or Kevin Millar’s endless quotability, or Manny’s tendency to always be Manny. I didn&#8217;t know they went back and did it again in 2007 with plenty of new faces, including the undefinable Pedroia, the Laser Show and the Muddy Chicken, who I did know was a man after my own heart as soon as I read about his “Ask Jeff Francis who the fuck I am,” quote.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I’m on my ninth year with the Boston Red Sox now, and I&#8217;ve seen my fair share of highs and lows, from fried chicken and beer to getting a chance to watch a Boston championship myself. I got to see David Ortiz’s famed postseason heroics live before my eyes, as he was engulfed in flames against the Cardinals and drove the team of beards and Koji Uehara high fives to their third title in ten years. Those 2013 Red Sox rebounded from the worst record in the AL East the year before, which in some ways encapsulates what its been like to follow this team over that time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">If the Red Sox built my Boston fandom, then the Celtics cemented it. My timing wasn’t any better with them &#8212; I started following just late enough to miss the dominant 2007-08 championship team. Still, over the next several seasons, I was hooked. The “Big Three” Celtics were a team of dominant personalities &#8212; Paul Pierce’s unshakable confidence, Kevin Garnett’s frenzied barking, Ray Allen’s unflappable consistency &#8212; and even as they all began to grow old, there was a pridefulness to them. The decrepit Celtics were an annoyance, the team that would give too much effort every night and use their veteran saavy to frustrate younger, more athletic teams. They took LeBron James and the eventual champion Miami Heat to seven games in the 2011-12 Eastern Conference Finals, and it was sort of a last hurrah for the group. LeBron might have buried them, but they went out swinging.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/N7Gvg4M2wVs?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Since the Celtics’ loss to Miami and the Red Sox win over St. Louis the next year, the two franchises have seemed to trend in different directions. The Celtics hit rock bottom in 2013-14, going 25-57 and finishing 12th in the Eastern Conference. They’ve made the playoffs and improved their record in every season since. Meanwhile, the Red Sox have been, to some extent, treading water. They’ve posted two losing seasons since the championship, followed by consecutive 93-win campaigns where they never really felt like a legitimate contender.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">It feels as though there’s just more of a </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">plan</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400"> behind the Celtics than the Red Sox. Danny Ainge has spent years meticulously compiling and flipping draft picks, capitalizing on undervalued players, and finding the right opportunities to spend. The two most significant free agent signings in franchise history &#8212; Al Horford and Gordon Hayward &#8212; came in the past two offseasons. Ainge avoids panic moves and trades from a position of strength as well as any GM in professional sports, to the point where he’s often teased for his reluctance to part with his assets. This past summer, the Celtics passed on a number of potential deals for superstars who changed teams. Paul George was available, but is also on the final year of his contract, likely to bolt for Los Angeles this coming summer. It was a bad bet for Ainge to pay up for a player he couldn’t guarantee he could keep, so he didn’t.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">On the flip side, the Red Sox have seen three executives in charge of baseball operations since 2011, and few baseball executives are more different than one another in terms of philosophy than the latter two &#8212; Ben Cherington and Dave Dombrowski. Cherington, though he had his own faults, was more similar to Ainge &#8212; building up the farm system and avoiding bad contracts that would kill flexibility… right up until he signed two </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">awful </span></i><span style="font-weight: 400">contracts that </span><span style="font-weight: 400">destroyed</span><span style="font-weight: 400"> his flexibility in Pablo Sandoval and Hanley Ramirez.</span></p>
<blockquote><p>The Red Sox have seen three executives in charge of baseball operations since 2011, and few baseball executives are more different than one another in terms of philosophy than the latter two.</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Enter Dombrowski, who, to a fault, loves the big splash. Dombrowski was hired in August of 2015, and by November, he’d already shelled out $217 million to David Price and shipped four prospects away in exchange for Craig Kimbrel. That’s not to say these deals were the wrong things to do at the time, but considering Dombrowski’s body of work, it’s a fair critique to say that he often opts to throw money and assets at problems until they go away.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">Subsequently, this current offseason isn’t terribly surprising. Dombrowski is locked in a staring contest with J.D. Martinez, who is a player this lineup desperately needs. The Red Sox are starved for power, and previous deals have left the farm system depleted enough to make trades for top-end talent difficult. If Martinez ends up elsewhere, there may not be another move to be made right now.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">And in some ways, that’s the point. Danny Ainge didn’t </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400">need</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400"> Paul George. He was building on a team that made the conference finals the year before and months later is sitting in first place in the conference right now, all while sitting on a treasure hoard of draft picks and young talent. He’s a strong, independent GM who don’t need no blockbuster trade. There were dozens of pathways open to the Celtics this past summer, and all Ainge had to do was find the one he liked the best. The one he chose has the Celtics competitive right now without sacrificing virtually any long-term upside.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">This kind of result is difficult to achieve without consistency, and, in essence, the Red Sox have been an organizational roller coaster. Cherington took charge and immediately had to address missteps by Theo Epstein, most notably the infamous Carl Crawford contract. Since his departure, Cherington’s carefully cultivated farm system has largely either graduated or been shipped off by Dombrowski. Conversely, Dombrowski has had to struggle with those albatross contracts for Sandoval and Ramirez, the latter of which is still owed $44 million over the next two years, assuming his option vests. They’ve been tying knots and challenging the next guy to unravel them. Is Dave Dombrowski the guy to lead a franchise to sustained, long-term success? Tigers fans of the past three seasons might have some thoughts on the matter.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">This is all a long way of saying that, as a fan, the Red Sox don’t give me that feeling of utter confidence the way the Celtics do. Remember the feeling we all had when that large contract for Pablo Sandoval looked likely, even though the case against that signing was obvious? It’s certainly unrealistic to expect any team to operate as efficiently and with as high of a success rate as the Celtics have over the past 10+ years, but there’s an unavoidable aura of “I hope this doesn’t blow up in our faces” in place.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">My point is not to predict doom and gloom with the current state of the Red Sox. Far from it. They’re more likely than not to win 90+ games again this season, and they have a collection of young stars like Mookie Betts, Andrew Benintendi, and Rafael Devers that will be anchoring the lineup for years to come. They have two Cy Young winners in their starting rotation, and those guys aren’t even as good as their ace. If you’re going to have problems with your baseball franchise, these are probably the ones to have &#8212; it certainly beats being the Derek Jeter-led Marlins.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/brLINZMIeic?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">But following the Red Sox transformed my sports fandom, and not long after that, the Celtics did it again. It’s impossible not to compare the two. I love watching Mookie Betts and Chris Sale, but on the macro level, something’s just fundamentally </span><span style="font-weight: 400">off </span><span style="font-weight: 400">with the Red Sox right now, and it’s never more apparent than when the Celtics are on TV. With as much as the team has going for it right now, it’s telling that they’re receiving so little buzz &#8212; and that’s without mentioning how the Yankees appear to be rising fast.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I can’t say for sure how good the Red Sox will be this season &#8212; too much depends on Martinez’s status, first and foremost. Players like Price, Ramirez, and Pedroia are aging, Chris Sale has two years remaining on his contract, and younger contributors like Betts and Bogaerts are into their arbitration seasons. Jason Groome and Michael Chavis are nice prospects, but even Groome is still a-ways off, and the system around them is thin. Major roster decisions are coming in the next few years, and it’s hard to divine the greater plan in place here &#8212; if in fact there is one.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400">I know the Celtics will be very good, though. They already are, and there isn’t much reason to think they won’t continue to be for years to come. Danny Ainge has put together a well-oiled machine that has missed the playoffs only three times since the 2003-04 season. For a Red Sox franchise in need of some year-to-year consistency and sustained success, looking to their sibling franchise for some ideas might not be the worst idea.</span></p>
<p><em>Photo by Greg M. Cooper &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/25/the-red-sox-the-celtics-and-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roster Recap: Josh Rutledge Gets Gone</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/18/roster-recap-josh-rutledge-gets-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/18/roster-recap-josh-rutledge-gets-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Cowett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Longoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Rutledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troy Tulowitzki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=33352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another middle infielder? My favorite!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you guys, but I am positively ecstatic to bring you yet another Roster Recap of another one of the Red Sox&#8217;s cabal of middling middle infielders! Are you excited? Yeah, I didn&#8217;t really expect you to be. I&#8217;m just happy you&#8217;re here, really. I know, I wish J.D. Martinez would sign already too.</p>
<p>If you think this offseason has been dragging, well, Josh Rutledge was on the Red Sox for <em>three</em> seasons. Doesn&#8217;t really seem like it, but yes, he indeed logged 259 plate appearances with this team since 2015. And if that wasn&#8217;t enough, he was placed on the 60-day disabled list last year after he underwent surgery for patellar tendonitis, then he was optioned to Pawtucket, and after that, he elected to enter free agency. The Rockies then signed him to a minor league deal, but he was eligible to be picked in the Rule 5 draft, and wouldn&#8217;t you know it, the Red Sox brought him right back with the 14th pick in that draft. That seems like a bit much to bring back a guy with a career .695 OPS and a mediocre glove, but sometimes you just don&#8217;t understand the Red Sox.</p>
<p>Towards the tail-end of spring training, Rutledge suffered a left hamstring strain, and hit the 10-day DL to start the season. He didn&#8217;t return until April 25th, then had to be sat for a few games in early June thanks to dehydration. Then he had to be put on the 7-day concussion DL in late June, and spoke of &#8220;persistent soreness&#8221; in his hip. By the end of July, Rutledge was (once again) on the 60-day DL, having needed surgery on that hip, and he underwent the knife in late August. The Red Sox outrighted him this winter.</p>
<p>Admittedly, that&#8217;s a lot, and if you think that was exhausting to read, imagine writing it. Or watch him try to hit. That&#8217;s pretty draining too.</p>
<h4>What Went Right</h4>
<p>He did a cool thing here and there, I guess.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/m/1491405083" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>Otherwise, not much else. He did get paid to play baseball professionally, which is a pretty good thing no matter how you frame it.</p>
<h4>What Went Wrong</h4>
<p>His medical history is so lengthy and filled with injuries that even glass thinks he&#8217;s too fragile. 2017 was no exception.</p>
<p>He also posted a .558 OPS in 118 PA, and racked up a -0.3 WARP. Yikes.</p>
<h4>What To Expect</h4>
<p>Whatever he does, it won&#8217;t be with the Red Sox. Rutledge signed a minor-league deal with the San Francisco Giants in December, so now he&#8217;s behind such players as Evan Longoria and Pablo Sandoval. Hopefully, the Red Sox don&#8217;t feel like reclaiming him this time, and let the less injury-prone guys on the bench do the heavy lifting when it comes to being a part-time player. This isn&#8217;t even a &#8220;if you love something, let it go&#8221; situation &#8212; the Red Sox just need to let go.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Winslow Townson &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/18/roster-recap-josh-rutledge-gets-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roster Recap: A Guy Named Chase d&#8217;Arnaud</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/05/roster-recap-a-guy-named-chase-darnaud/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/05/roster-recap-a-guy-named-chase-darnaud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Kory]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brock Holt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase d'Arnaud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Pedroia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernando Abad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Mauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Farrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=32656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was on the team, I swear.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it say about a player when pinch-hitter is listed second on a three item list of his defensive positions? What does it say about the same player who appeared in two games, and despite said list of defensive positions, never played the field? What does it say about a player when he was a member of three different organizations within the same calendar year, the least time of which came with the Boston Red Sox? What kind of impact can a player like that &#8212; we’ll call him “Chase d’Arnaud” &#8212; have? In this case, more impact than anyone could ever imagine, assuming nobody anywhere in New England possesses a functioning imagination.</p>
<p>“Imagine a…”</p>
<p>“Let me stop you right there.”</p>
<p>The Red Sox snagged d’Arnaud off waivers from the Atlanta Braves in the dead of night during a late April injury blizzard. Dustin Pedroia was having trouble with his knees, as was Pablo Sandoval who, it turned out, was also terrible. Brock Holt’s vertigo prevented him from helping out and Josh Rutledge was still in Triple-A recovering from a hamstring strain sustained while participating in ham-on-a-string exercises (unrelated) during Spring Training. All of a sudden, the Red Sox had no middle infielders they could play after Xander Bogaerts but, more importantly, they had no middle infielders they could not play. The Red Sox were all of a sudden a baseball team without this most important of commodities. Who was going to sit in the dugout, chat to nobody about things, and chew sunflower seeds?</p>
<p>Of course, the answer to their injury epidemic is obvious in retrospect: surgically remove the legs of every infielder on the roster and auction off the severed limbs for charity. Just think how one of Brock Holt’s legs would look in a plastic case adorned with a Red Sox logo up on your mantle? It’d be magnificent, and the Jimmy Fund would make a fortune. Strangely, that most clear of answers seemed to elude everyone, so, in lieu of that, the Red Sox went waiver wire dumpster diving to solve their problems. They came across some pretty sweet cardboard boxes, a few dead fish, Chase d’Arnaud, and bag of half-eaten cat crunchies.</p>
<p>You might not expect much of anyone acquired in such a manner, and certainly d’Arnaud was no different from those low expectations, but boy howdy he delivered on each and every low expectation. The Red Sox called on d’Arnaud during an early May game against the Twins. The Red Sox entered the ninth inning leading Minnesota 7-6, but the Red Sox quickly gained a small and precarious lead by scoring eight runs. After an infield single by Dustin Pedroia, manager John Farrell, looking down the barrel of a gun, turned to his best player.</p>
<p>“Get in there, d’Arnaud!” he probably didn’t ever shout.</p>
<p>“You got it, skip!” replied the ever-ready part-time pinch-hitter.</p>
<p>d’Arnaud took his place at first base and immediately began dancing dangerously off the bag. Twins pitcher Justin Haley threw over to first once, twice, three times, desperate to preserve the eight-run deficit for what he felt would be the Twins inevitable comeback during the bottom of the inning. But d’Arnaud’s wild dancing frustrated him. He threw over again and again and again and again, but each time d’Arnaud dove back just ahead of the tag. After Haley’s last throw, Twins first baseman Joe Mauer trotted over to Haley. “The kid’s just too good,” said Mauer. “Focus on the batter.”</p>
<p>“I can’t,” replied Haley. “I’m just too flummoxed. I’m going to have to throw a really bad pitch.”</p>
<p>“Well, uh, okay,” said Mauer, and handed Haley the ball. Haley’s next pitch was a meatball. Xander Bogaerts hit it for a triple, scoring Mookie Betts and d’Arnaud all the way from first, and extending the Red Sox lead to a comfortable 10 runs. The Red Sox were just able to hold on in the bottom of the inning. They won 17-6, all thanks to Chase d’Arnaud.</p>
<p>You might think that after such a performance the Red Sox might have started d’Arnaud, but they did not. Asked about it by reporters, manager John Farrell winked and grinned. “I like to keep my secret weapons where I can use them when I need them,” he said. Later that day against the Brewers, Farrell needed his secret once more. Trailing 6-1 in the top of the fifth inning, Farrell tried something radical. “This isn’t working,” he reportedly whispered to himself. “Think, John. Dammit, you’ve got to think!” With one out and the pitcher due up, it suddenly hit Farrell like a ton of bricks: d’Arnaud!</p>
<p>“Get in there, d’Arnaud!” he definitely didn’t ever say.</p>
<p>“You got it, skip!” replied the ever-ready part-time pinch-runner.</p>
<p>With d’Arnaud running up the steps, Farrell stopped him. “You’re going to need this,” he said, handing him a broom. “Was that supposed to be a bat?” d’Arnaud asked? “You guessed it,” chuckled Farrell. “I’m really not very good at this managing thing.” Thus inspired d’Arnaud stepped to the plate against possibly the best pitcher in the history of baseball, Wily Peralta.</p>
<p>Peralta’s first pitch was a 110 mph fastball on the corner. “Strike one!” shouted the umpire. His second pitch was a 120 mph fastball on the inside corner. “Strike two!” shouted the umpire. d’Arnaud stepped out of the box. He realized what he was up against. He knew how nobody had ever faced a more perilous situation in baseball, but he was determined. He cocked his bat and stood there watching as a 99 mph curveball draped itself around the plate. “Ball one,” said the umpire. Now d’Arnaud was ready. He stared out at Peralta who stared back, both knowing what was at stake, perhaps the most important fifth inning at-bat by non-rivals from different leagues in early May in baseball history.</p>
<p>Peralta reared back and fired. d’Arnaud took a mighty swing and hit a weak grounder up the middle. The second baseman fielded the ball, but his heart was heavy when he did, because he knew he could never catch d’Arnaud. Crossing the first base bag, d’Arnaud slowed and stopped before the enormity, the sheer gravity of what he’d done struck him. As his team mates raced from the dugout to mob him and the loudspeakers blared the theme to The Natural, d’Arnaud knelt gently in the grass, a single tear falling from his face. Somewhere, Robert Redford muttered, “No, that’s perfect,” as d’Arnaud was lifted and carried around the field by his teammates.</p>
<p>The next inning they took him out for Fernando Abad. That would be the last time d’Arnaud stepped on a playing field for the Boston Red Sox. Asked about his decision to release d’Arnaud, Team President Dave Dombrowski said, “When you love something, set it free.”</p>
<p>But I digress. On to his season recap!</p>
<h4>What Went Right</h4>
<p>He got an infield single in his only Red Sox at-bat.</p>
<h4>What Went Wrong</h4>
<p>Whatever.</p>
<h4>What To Expect</h4>
<p>Nothing.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Jeff Hanisch &#8212; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2018/01/05/roster-recap-a-guy-named-chase-darnaud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitch Moreland Should Be the Least of your Concerns</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/20/mitch-moreland-should-be-the-least-of-your-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/20/mitch-moreland-should-be-the-least-of-your-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cam Ellis]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Hosmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanley Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Moreland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Travis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=31820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a better deal than you expect.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For being a relatively minor move, the Red Sox resigning Mitch Moreland to a two-year, $13 million has proven to be a surprisingly divisive topic among the fanbase. As hard as Dave Dombrowski tries to sell people on the idea that he&#8217;s happy with the offensive potential he&#8217;s already assembled, he&#8217;s clearly going to make another move. The addition of one replacement-level first baseman to a below-average offense isn&#8217;t going to cut it, and Dombrowski knows that. For better or for worse, Dombrowski gets his guy, and I think it&#8217;s pretty clear another move is coming. Presumably, that move is signing J.D. Martinez, but I think that even if Martinez slips through their grasp and lands back in Arizona or DC, the Red Sox still make a significant move. (Although for the sake of what&#8217;s left in the farm system, let&#8217;s hope it doesn&#8217;t come to that.)</p>
<p>Outside the type of production that Moreland brings to the Red Sox, <a href="http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/11/21/roster-recap-mitch-morelands-meddling-toe/">which Brett Cowett went into a few weeks back</a>, the move gives provides an interesting insight how they&#8217;re evaluating the first base position heading into 2018.</p>
<p>If this were four years ago, Eric Hosmer leaves the Winter Meetings in a Red Sox jersey. I don&#8217;t think it plays a major role in day-to-day decision making, and every year is different, but I can&#8217;t help but feel like the handful of misfires over the past couple offseasons have scared the Red Sox away from going after Hosmer as hard as they otherwise would. Martinez isn&#8217;t a safe bet, but packaging Hosmer&#8217;s flawed hitting with his intangibles as a leader felt a lot like pairing Sandoval&#8217;s declining numbers with his postseason experience, or Hanley&#8217;s inconsistency with his desire to come back to the team that drafted him. I just don&#8217;t think the Red Sox were ready to put their chips on that color again.</p>
<p>The move&#8217;s also a pretty strong indictment of the role the team has in mind for Hanley Ramirez going forward. He&#8217;s already making $22 million this year, and only needs 497 plate appearances to cash in on another guaranteed $22 million in 2019. Durability isn&#8217;t on his side, but just try and imagine how awkward that situation becomes in August if Hanley has a healthy but unproductive year. That&#8217;s another incentive to get a deal done with Martinez; from an optics perspective, it&#8217;s a lot easier to get away with giving Hanley&#8217;s PAs to Martinez than it is giving them to Sam Travis. My gut says the team wants to give him one more shot at hitting lower in the lineup with a healthy shoulder, but his days in Boston are pretty clearly numbered. The idea of him not making next year&#8217;s team isn&#8217;t inconceivable anymore.</p>
<p>For his career, Mitch Moreland has been just below league average (98 wRC+, .263 TAv) at the plate. There&#8217;s obviously a chance he doesn&#8217;t break any toes next year and puts up consistently good numbers, but as a 32-year old with eight years experience, it&#8217;s pretty clear that he is what he is. Even with the time missed from breaking said toe, Moreland played in more games last year than he ever had before. Quickly, before I wrap up this Mitch Moreland-y assessment of Mitch Moreland, a quick player comparison:</p>
<p>Mitch Moreland in 2017 (576 PAs): .246/.326/.443, 98 wRC+, 22 HRs, 0.48 BB/K</p>
<p>Player B in 2017 (553 PAs): .242/.320/.429, 93 wRC+, 23 HRs, 0.44 BB/K</p>
<p>Player B? Why that&#8217;s Hanley Ramirez! Last year, Moreland was essentially Hanley Ramirez with better defense, and I&#8217;ll let you choose who that speaks more about.</p>
<p>Fellow BP Bostonian Matthew Kory put it best:</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mitch Moreland is not good. Giving him two years is bad. Spending $13M to avoid giving Eric Hosmer $175M is a damn bargain</p>
<p>&mdash; Matthew Kory (@mattymatty2000) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattymatty2000/status/942881360934350848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 18, 2017</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>The good news is that the Red Sox avoided giving another lengthy contract to a flawed hitter. It&#8217;s a safe, albeit expensive, insurance policy. Just go sign Martinez and none of this will matter anymore.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Ken Blaze &#8211; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/20/mitch-moreland-should-be-the-least-of-your-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roster Recap: The Pablo Sandoval Era Mercifully Ends</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/19/roster-recap-the-pablo-sandoval-era-mercifully-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/19/roster-recap-the-pablo-sandoval-era-mercifully-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Cowett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roster Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Cherington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deven Marrero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Rutledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=31780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Panda goes back home.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2015 already feels like such a long time ago.</p>
<p>Back then, Pablo Sandoval was one of the premier signings of the offseason, having inked a five-year, $95 million contract. This was to lock him into playing the hot corner in Boston until 2019 and force open the next window of contention for the Red Sox. Optimism was guarded, but high. After a injury-plagued, loss-filled 2014 season, we all expected a rebound for the team in 2015, and Sandoval would be one of the reasons why.</p>
<p>2015 was a dumpster fire, mostly. 2016 happened with very little Panda involvement. 2017 didn&#8217;t even come with a dead cat bounce for the third baseman. Sandoval barely made it halfway through his contract before being released, and three years post-signing, that contract is regarded as one of the worst in recent memory, and definitely Ben Cherington&#8217;s worst signing, if not the worst transaction of his tenure as general manager of the Red Sox.</p>
<p>So, now that we&#8217;ve started this off on a good note, let&#8217;s take a look at what Sandoval did this season!</p>
<h4>What Went Right</h4>
<p>Back when we still had hope for him, Sandoval did a thing!</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PdUIpW0qwtI?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left">And after he went back to the San Francisco Giants and continued to flounder for a while, he did another thing!</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.mlb.com/video/share/must-c-sandovals-walk-off-shot/c-1859785483?tid=11493214" width="540" height="304" scrolling="no" ></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left">He wasn&#8217;t all bad &#8212; just 95% or so.</p>
<h4>What Went Wrong</h4>
<p>Saying everything else feels like hyperbole, but it really was everything else. The comeback from shoulder surgery never materialized, as Sandoval posted a paltry .215 TAv in 108 plate appearances for the Red Sox in 2017, and saw dwindling time in the field in lieu of guys like Josh Rutledge. His glove was still missing in action, couldn&#8217;t get consistent starting time, and was the recipient of some bad luck, even if his overall offensive output was a detriment to the team.</p>
<p>Sandoval went on the disabled list with an ear infection on June 20th, and never wore a Red Sox uniform again. The Red Sox kept him rehabbing in the minors as long as they possibly could, designated him for assignment on July 14th, and finally released him five days later. The Giants signed him to a minor league contract on July 22nd, and you can find my analysis for that move <a href="https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/32330/transaction-analysis-panda-2-0/" target="_blank">over at BP</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really hard to overstate just how bad he was in Boston. Overall, his tenure saw him churn out an accumulated -1.8 WARP over 620 PA. Nothing about him was consistently good, with any aspect of his game ranging from mediocre at best to disastrous at worst. When Deven Marrero &#8212; <em>Deven Marrero!</em> &#8212; is keeping even with you offensively, you know you&#8217;re pretty abysmal at the plate. The difference between Sandoval and Marrero, however, is that Marrero is a wizard with a glove, and Sandoval &#8212; well, let&#8217;s just say he wasn&#8217;t very magical out there. Thus he became a $40 million benchwarmer, and the Red Sox ate the money to rid themselves of him.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t a good signing to begin with, and it turned out even worse than anyone could&#8217;ve imagined. There&#8217;s no sugarcoating something that was this bad.</p>
<h4>What To Expect</h4>
<p>Nothing for the Red Sox, not anymore. He&#8217;s still with the Giants, and they have very little to lose by keeping him on the roster for now. Would it be cool to see him succeed again? Sure would! Is it likely? Not really, no. Sandoval wasn&#8217;t the type of player that would age gracefully, and at 31 years old, that shortened aging curve is really taking him for a downhill ride. There&#8217;s probably some decent baseball left in him, but if the Giants release him sometime next year, that&#8217;s probably it for the Panda. There&#8217;s not much else to say that hasn&#8217;t already been said, but you can only wish things had gone better with him.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Patrick McDermott &#8211; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/12/19/roster-recap-the-pablo-sandoval-era-mercifully-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Costs of Going All In</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/20/the-costs-of-going-all-in/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/20/the-costs-of-going-all-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Kory]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Benintendi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Dombrowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giancarlo Stanton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mookie Betts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Porcello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusney Castillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xander Bogaerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=28568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The team has reached a financial crossroads.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This off-season represents a fork in the road for the Red Sox franchise. Coming off a(nother) 93-win season, one with significant injuries and underperformance from key young players, the Red Sox could be forgiven for returning the same roster in 2018, perhaps with a few minor tweaks, in the hopes that better things lie ahead. However, it could be argued that the baseball landscape has changed in such a way as to make reassembling the 2017 Red Sox next spring an exercise in futility. In order to not just be competitive but to have a legitimate chance at the World Series, can the Red Sox afford to rerun the 2017 season, or are significant reinforcements required? This is the macro decision that Team President Dave Dombrowski will be faced with this offseason.</p>
<p>We’ve entered into a time when the talent base in Major League Baseball is as stratified as it’s been in a long time, possibly since free agency took hold. This 2017 season featured three 100-win teams, the Dodgers, Astros, and Cleveland. If you believe pythagorean record though, the Yankees should also be added to that list, as their runs scored and allowed numbers were those of a 100-62 team. That only intensifies the situation the Red Sox find themselves in. Over the past 14 seasons (as far back as I looked) there are two seasons with multiple 100-win teams: 2004 and this past season. Obviously there is only one season over that time period that featured more than two 100-win teams: the 2017 season. For Boston, this means three incredibly talented franchises are standing in the way of a World Series win, four if you include the Yankees, and really, why wouldn’t you? That&#8217;s a daunting landscape.</p>
<p>The fact that three of those four are in the American League should be downright terrifying if you work on Yawkey Way. This sets the bar extremely high to win a World Series. Just look at what the Yankees will have to do to win this year’s World Series. They beat the 102-win Indians, and they’re likely to beat the 101-win Astros. Their reward should they accomplish that? They get to play the 104-win Dodgers! That has to be about the most brutal stretch of postseason play imaginable! The only other team I can recall who bested multiple 100-win teams in a single postseason was the 2004 Red Sox, who beat the 101-win Yankees and the 105-win Cardinals, but also beat the 92-win Angels in the first round. Otherwise, this level of competition is unprecedented, yet this is exactly what the 2018 Red Sox are likely to face.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6tz1az1W_ME?rel=0" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>So how does a team deal with this kind of competition &#8211; a kind of competition that hasn’t been seen in baseball at least for the past few decades, if ever? There are multiple ways of looking at things. The Red Sox could subscribe to what we’ll call the Billy Beane Theory, which says, roughly, just make the playoffs and whatever happens after that is out of your control. The problem with that is it’s only sort of true. Luck plays a huge role in any small sample of baseball games, but even so, it’s incredibly infrequent that a bad team, or even a team you couldn’t make an argument for as one of the best teams in baseball, wins the World Series. It does happen (2011 Cardinals, 2006 Cardinals), but it’s infrequent at best. And just considering the competition, it seems like a poor bet to make. The other part is one of those 100-win teams is in Boston’s division, and the other two are in the other two divisions, so right off you’re competing with the rest of the American League for the Wild Card.</p>
<p>So perhaps the Red Sox should go out and sign J.D. Martinez and trade for Giancarlo Stanton and do more and more and become another 100-win franchise. The problem with that is where the Red Sox are financially. They managed to stay under the luxury cap in 2017 so the tax rate for going over has now dropped substantially, but there is still a penalty. The luxury tax threshold will be $197 million for 2018 and the Red Sox are at $146 million in guarantees before signing anyone eligible for arbitration. Cutting to the end of the page, Cot&#8217;s Contracts estimates the Red Sox to be at $202 million, or $5 million over the cap, before making any additions. For context, the Dodgers spent in the neighborhood of $245 million this season. If the Red Sox are going to go out and give Martinez $20 million and take on Stanton’s contract which will pay him $30 a season going forward, you’re talking about blowing past the Dodgers payroll. Maybe that’s doable for an ownership group that really wants to win another World Series. Maybe the finances are set now that the penalties have been lowered and the team is ready to go all in. Dave Dombrowski is an all-in kind of guy, as we’ve seen. But Pablo Sandoval is making $18.5 million next season and again the season after that. Then, in 2020, there’s a $5 million buyout, but you can take most of those savings and flush them down the nearest toilet because that is also the season that Rusney Castillo’s contract goes from $11 million a season to $14 million. The next is Rick Porcello’s last at $21.125 million per season. That&#8217;s a lot of money over a lot of years, and most of it isn&#8217;t likely to do much to help the Red Sox on the field.</p>
<blockquote><p>Bringing on a player of [Stanton&#8217;s] caliber means the Red Sox are committing to spending over the luxury tax threshold for the foreseeable future.</p></blockquote>
<p>Again, here’s that word “maybe.” Maybe the way the Red Sox dealt with Sandoval and, to a lesser but still significant extent, Castillo, is the new way forward. Damn the torpedoes and all of that, but that seems unlikely. It’s not as sexy, granted, but maybe there’s another win in Jackie Bradley’s bat, and two more in Andrew Benintendi if he can avoid an extended midseason slump, and two more in Mookie Betts’ bat while we&#8217;re at it, and I couldn’t tell you how many more but a lot more in every part of Xander Bogaerts. Take all that and add a healthy David Price &#8211; the guy the organization made a $217 million bet on, remember &#8211; and someone tell Rick Porcello to stop throwing belt high 90 mph heaters and before you know it there’s 98, 99, or 100 wins. Maybe.</p>
<p>Would J.D. Martinez help that cause? You better believe it. Would Stanton? A million times over, yes. But what would be the long term impact of bringing one or both or a similar player to Boston? The Red Sox are a New England institution to be sure, but Fenway isn’t growing more seats and NESN can only broadcast 162 games a year. Revenues might go up a bit, but bringing on a player of that caliber means the Red Sox are committing to spending over the luxury tax threshold for the foreseeable future. This of course only gets worse if you want to sign Mookie Betts or Benintendi or Devers to a long term contract.</p>
<p>It’s an extremely tough choice Dave Dombrowski finds himself with. Is it reasonable, or realistic even, to squeeze out seven or eight more wins from this roster that has seemed to peter out at 93 over the past two seasons? That argument can be made. But what is the cost of that not happening? What if this team doesn’t add those wins? What if Price isn’t healthy? What if he is?</p>
<p>The Red Sox are going to spend a lot of money in 2018, that much is for certain. What they get for it is less known. So maybe they should spend more. Or maybe that would sink them. The thing about forks in the road is you have to pick a direction because going straight ahead never works. If he&#8217;s not now, Dave Dombrowski is about to become aware of that.</p>
<p><em>Photo by Bob DeChiara &#8211; USA TODAY Sports</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/10/20/the-costs-of-going-all-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money Makes Margins</title>
		<link>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/24/money-makes-margins/</link>
		<comments>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/24/money-makes-margins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Cowett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Archer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daisuke Matsuzaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jed Lowrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Beckett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/?p=23924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money is good, yes, but what does it do for the team?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t too long ago that the Red Sox, needing to shed themselves of several mediocre third basemen, designated Pablo Sandoval for assignment. The five-year, $95 million deal barely got past the halfway point before the Red Sox ate over $40 million to cut him. You don&#8217;t need me to go into detail on how horrible that transaction was. It was even <em>backloaded.</em> That deal alone was pretty damning for Ben Cherington, and he was fired eight months later after the 2015 squad crashed and burned. It was a huge mistake, and that might be oversimplifying it a little bit.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s good news, everyone! The Red Sox, if you haven&#8217;t heard, have lots and lots of money. $95 million spread out over half a decade isn&#8217;t all that much in the grand scheme of things to this ball club. In addition to a lucrative farm system that has recently developed some ready-made stars, the Red Sox profit from a massive fanbase and repeated successes to have one of the largest payrolls in baseball, one that rubs shoulders with the luxury tax threshold from time to time. This all might seem like me reciting things you already know in a slightly condescending tone, but I promise I&#8217;m going somewhere with this.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EdBo06CUqxw" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" ></iframe></p>
<p>Think of all the big, awful contracts the Red Sox have had since the beginning of the decade. Carl Crawford, obviously. Josh Beckett&#8217;s extension is a plausible one. Daisuke Matsuzaka&#8217;s posting and deal were pretty bad. Hell, if you wanted to be really petty, you could say Julio Lugo&#8217;s four-year, $36 million deal was big and terrible due to the player they offered it to, and you&#8217;d have some compelling arguments. Looking back on those deals, could you honestly say any one of them crippled the short- or long-term future of the Red Sox? Probably not. Definitely not, if you consider the state of the payroll in 2017.</p>
<p>The Red Sox have effectively recovered from all their major contract screw-ups because they are a factory of money. It gives them a ton of leeway to make these huge deals in the first place. If those transactions don&#8217;t pan out, the torrent of cash that flows in allows the Sox to either cut those players and eat the money, or trade them away and still get something of value back, since they&#8217;re still paying a large percentage of the contract. Money gives the Red Sox a large margin of error, and the payroll can effectively tank the hit of a couple bad deals.</p>
<blockquote><p>It isn&#8217;t just the exorbitant bidding in free agency that boxes out small-payroll teams &#8211; it&#8217;s the extreme regression risk that comes with any mega-deal.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is the benefit of having a luxury-tax-pushing payroll that isn&#8217;t discussed very often. The inequality between the Red Sox and a team like the Rays or Athletics usually comes in the form of being able to make those deals. The Red Sox can price out those teams for any given player, if they felt compelled to do so. What isn&#8217;t talked about enough is what could happen after that deal is struck. A team like the Sox or Yankees can be saddled with a failure of a mega-deal (see: Ellsbury, Jacoby) and continue to compete and win. For the Rays and A&#8217;s, however, a player falling off on a huge deal would utterly cripple their short-term payroll and outlook, and might adversely affect their long-term plans. It isn&#8217;t just the exorbitant bidding in free agency that boxes out small-payroll teams, since deferments are a thing &#8211; it&#8217;s the extreme regression risk that comes with any mega-deal.</p>
<p>Pablo Sandoval would&#8217;ve earned an even $17 million this year. The Rays could fit Chris Archer&#8217;s, Kevin Kiermaier&#8217;s, Wilson Ramos&#8217;, and Corey Dickerson&#8217;s salaries into that with room to spare. The A&#8217;s would have wiggle room if you combined what Jed Lowrie, Yonder Alonso, and Rajai Davis are all getting paid in 2017 and shoved it in there. For those teams, having a player implode with $17 million attached to their name would deny them quite a lot of useful additions and potential trade chips. Now imagine losing out on getting good players on one-year deals &#8211; and the potential prospects that you&#8217;d receive by trading them &#8211; for <em>four more years</em>. That&#8217;s catastrophic at best, and a front office house cleaning at worst.</p>
<p>Sometimes, though, even the big payroll teams reach their limit. Burdened with Beckett&#8217;s contract extension, Crawford&#8217;s albatross contract, and the first year of Adrian Gonzalez&#8217;s extension, the Red Sox were hurting for salary relief. In a move that was the polar opposite of the Sandoval deal, Cherington offloaded all three of those contracts (plus Nick Punto) to the Los Angeles Dodgers, and while the prospects they received didn&#8217;t amount to much, getting over $250 million of salary off your books is still pretty damn good. The Red Sox were saved from a decade of payroll crunches due to a very shrewd waiver trade in August. They found the limits of the margins their money made for them.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t something that should be touted, honestly. It&#8217;s more of an unspoken benefit, a representation of the disparity in revenue between some of the teams in baseball. That kind of money allows for teams to not just go out and get players they want, but to make mistakes, and quickly recover from them. Sometimes big contracts work, and sometimes they don&#8217;t. The difference here is that when they don&#8217;t, the Red Sox can deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boston.locals.baseballprospectus.com/2017/07/24/money-makes-margins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
